On Wed, 22 Nov 2023 16:14:12 GMT, John Neffenger wrote:
> The only thing that didn't get copied over with the original commit is the
> updated copyright statement in the VersionInfo.java class:
That's because the copyright year was updated separately and later as part of
[JDK-8318714](https://
On Tue, 21 Nov 2023 20:19:04 GMT, John Neffenger wrote:
> Backport 16169240667876633895b27464eb90033abb6166
>
> Please review this backport of openjdk/jfx#1253 to JavaFX 21. Please give me
> a day or two to test it again before starting your review.
The backport looks good and works as expecte
On Tue, 21 Nov 2023 20:19:04 GMT, John Neffenger wrote:
> Backport 16169240667876633895b27464eb90033abb6166
>
> Please review this backport of openjdk/jfx#1253 to JavaFX 21. Please give me
> a day or two to test it again before starting your review.
I ran the builds and unit tests on Linux, ma
Backport 16169240667876633895b27464eb90033abb6166
Please review this backport of openjdk/jfx#1253 to JavaFX 21. Please give me a
day or two to test it again before starting your review.
-
Commit messages:
- Backport 16169240667876633895b27464eb90033abb6166
Changes: https://git.ope
On Tue, 10 Oct 2023 16:24:42 GMT, John Neffenger wrote:
>> Please review these changes to the build timestamp and to the JavaFX runtime
>> version available in the system properties.
>
> John Neffenger has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
> commit since the last revisi
On Tue, 10 Oct 2023 16:24:42 GMT, John Neffenger wrote:
>> Please review these changes to the build timestamp and to the JavaFX runtime
>> version available in the system properties.
>
> John Neffenger has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
> commit since the last revisi
On Tue, 10 Oct 2023 16:24:42 GMT, John Neffenger wrote:
>> Please review these changes to the build timestamp and to the JavaFX runtime
>> version available in the system properties.
>
> John Neffenger has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
> commit since the last revisi
> Please review these changes to the build timestamp and to the JavaFX runtime
> version available in the system properties.
John Neffenger has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last revision:
Update the documentation in UPDATING-VERSION.md
-
On Mon, 2 Oct 2023 22:06:38 GMT, John Neffenger wrote:
> Please review these changes to the build timestamp and to the JavaFX runtime
> version available in the system properties.
Thanks, Kevin. I'll fix that.
To all reviewers: I added tests of the method
[VersionInfo.setupSystemProperties][1
On Mon, 2 Oct 2023 22:06:38 GMT, John Neffenger wrote:
> Please review these changes to the build timestamp and to the JavaFX runtime
> version available in the system properties.
The fix and new test both look good. Testing is green.
Can you also change the following in
[`UPDATING-VERSION.md
On Mon, 2 Oct 2023 22:06:38 GMT, John Neffenger wrote:
> Please review these changes to the build timestamp and to the JavaFX runtime
> version available in the system properties.
@tiainen can you review?
-
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1253#issuecomment-1754743752
On Mon, 2 Oct 2023 22:06:38 GMT, John Neffenger wrote:
> Please review these changes to the build timestamp and to the JavaFX runtime
> version available in the system properties.
@arapte or @johanvos Can one of you also review this?
-
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/
On Mon, 2 Oct 2023 22:06:38 GMT, John Neffenger wrote:
> Please review these changes to the build timestamp and to the JavaFX runtime
> version available in the system properties.
@FlorianKirmaier Florian, I would appreciate any comments you might have, too,
or even a formal review if you have
On Mon, 2 Oct 2023 22:06:38 GMT, John Neffenger wrote:
> Please review these changes to the build timestamp and to the JavaFX runtime
> version available in the system properties.
This pull request makes three changes:
1. The ISO 8601 extended format of the build date and time is now used only
On Mon, 2 Oct 2023 22:06:38 GMT, John Neffenger wrote:
> Please review these changes to the build timestamp and to the JavaFX runtime
> version available in the system properties.
I'll take a closer look, and also test this, when I can. This looks like the
right approach to me. It should not c
Please review these changes to the build timestamp and to the JavaFX runtime
version available in the system properties.
-
Commit messages:
- 8317370: JavaFX runtime version is wrong at runtime
Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1253/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.or
16 matches
Mail list logo