Clean backport of JDK-8318387.
-
Commit messages:
- Backport 606878af275dbad551a10653c92a2deef61c10cd
Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx21u/pull/33/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jfx21u&pr=33&range=00
Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8318387
Stats:
On Tue, 31 Oct 2023 11:46:57 GMT, Florian Kirmaier
wrote:
>> The Method javafx.print.getWidth and getHeight returns a double of points.
>> But the values are always rounded to full integers. This causes especially
>> problems,
>> with mm based Papers.
>>
>> I asked in the mailing list, with th
On Sat, 5 Aug 2023 12:28:16 GMT, Thorsten Fischer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I did open the bug report. Some notes to this PR:
>
> My colleagues and I are able to reproduce this bug regularly, even though it
> takes sometimes up to 3 or 4 weeks until the D3DERR_DEVICEHUNG error shows
> up. We are curre
On Sat, 5 Aug 2023 12:28:16 GMT, Thorsten Fischer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I did open the bug report. Some notes to this PR:
>
> My colleagues and I are able to reproduce this bug regularly, even though it
> takes sometimes up to 3 or 4 weeks until the D3DERR_DEVICEHUNG error shows
> up. We are curre
On Mon, 20 Nov 2023 22:24:58 GMT, Marius Hanl wrote:
> When a nested column is dragged, the column drag header (blue) is positioned
> wrong.
> It appears at the very left of the table and not where the column is.
>
> ` as the
>> `UIA_NamePropertyId`.
>> For other control
On Wed, 15 Nov 2023 22:00:13 GMT, Alexander Zuev wrote:
>> Create implementation for Slider and Stepper accessibility protocols.
>> Fix mapping.
>> Fix performAction parameter type in declaration.
>
> Alexander Zuev has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
> commit since th
> Currently we use the value of spinner as it's `UIA_NamePropertyId` when a11y
> client application requests for it.
> Ideally we should use the text set by `Node.setAccessibleText()` as the
> `UIA_NamePropertyId`.
> For other controls such as Slider, ListView we use the text set by
> setAccessi
On Tue, 21 Nov 2023 20:19:04 GMT, John Neffenger wrote:
> Backport 16169240667876633895b27464eb90033abb6166
>
> Please review this backport of openjdk/jfx#1253 to JavaFX 21. Please give me
> a day or two to test it again before starting your review.
I ran the builds and unit tests on Linux, ma
No concerns, good idea.
On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 5:23 PM Kevin Rushforth
wrote:
> This one looks OK to me as long as there are no dependencies on other
> fixes. It's been in jfx22 for a couple months, and don't recall any
> regressions.
>
> Johan and Jose: you reviewed it, any concerns?
>
> -- Ke
10 matches
Mail list logo
