No concerns, good idea. On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 5:23 PM Kevin Rushforth <kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com> wrote:
> This one looks OK to me as long as there are no dependencies on other > fixes. It's been in jfx22 for a couple months, and don't recall any > regressions. > > Johan and Jose: you reviewed it, any concerns? > > -- Kevin > > > On 11/21/2023 8:13 AM, Thiago Milczarek Sayão wrote: > > Hi Kevin, > > Some folks from the JabRef project asked to backport this: > https://github.com/openjdk/jfx/pull/1173 > <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/openjdk/jfx/pull/1173__;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!KqeLuw9kQEmxdpB01cm2FpzoEnm7XzyDOGX48jBCJfkN33A8rqB8xb_sFYATLOfr09UqIfOJXtzqfLoMUXyA68BtQaM$> > > JabRef project issue: > https://github.com/JabRef/jabref/issues/5867 > <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/JabRef/jabref/issues/5867__;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!KqeLuw9kQEmxdpB01cm2FpzoEnm7XzyDOGX48jBCJfkN33A8rqB8xb_sFYATLOfr09UqIfOJXtzqfLoMUXyAMbrKW4c$> > > I don't know if it fits the backport rationale. > > -- Thiago. > > > > > > Em seg., 20 de nov. de 2023 às 21:59, Kevin Rushforth < > kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com> escreveu: > >> All, >> >> If you have backports that you want to get into jfx21u for JavaFX >> 21.0.2, please do so by Monday, December 4th. Note that approval from >> one of the project leads is needed as outlined in this message [1]. >> >> Thanks. >> >> -- Kevin >> >> [1] >> https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/openjfx-dev/2023-August/042200.html >> >> >
