Is there some hello-world-starter-SFEspec-file or some
SFE-for-the-really-retarded I could read to get me thru doing this?
On 2011-10-17 04:09, openindiana-discuss-requ...@openindiana.org wrote:
Message: 6
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 15:46:46 -0400
From: Alex Viskovatoff
To: Discussion list for Ope
Thank you,
I will try to do that.
Paolo
Il 10/15/11 5:55 PM, Josef 'Jeff' Sipek ha scritto:
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 05:30:43PM +0200, Paolo Marcheschi wrote:
Hi
I would like to add a software for DICOM Medical images, "DCMTK is a
collection of libraries and applications implementing large parts
I just noticed an article on the OI wiki with instructions for building
newer versions of X than the one included with oi_151a (
http://wiki.openindiana.org/oi/Building+XNV_174a+on+oi_151a). I'm a bit
unclear on the contents because it alternately refers to both XNV_174a and
XNV_175a. The latest ve
Ian,
Xnv_175a was the 'upstream' test build run on oi_151a. Xnv_174a is the current
build in OI sustaining so the wiki reflects how to do the build using the Xnv
sustaining repo for OI.
The sustaining repos may be updated soon to reflect the latest upstream so this
may longer be an issue.
~
* Hans J. Albertsson [2011-10-17 10:50]:
> Is there some hello-world-starter-SFEspec-file or some
> SFE-for-the-really-retarded I could read to get me thru doing this?
pkgbuild specfiles are very similar to RPM specfiles so you may
look at Redhat's RPM guide to get an idea on how they work. The
d
On 10/17/11 05:30 AM, Ian Johnson wrote:
I just noticed an article on the OI wiki with instructions for building
newer versions of X than the one included with oi_151a (
http://wiki.openindiana.org/oi/Building+XNV_174a+on+oi_151a). I'm a bit
unclear on the contents because it alternately refers t
Thanks for the clarification. If Xnv_175a is the first version to support
Sandy Bridge graphics, did you follow mostly the same build process for it
as for 174a? I'd like to try building it from the upstream repo.
Ian Johnson
2011/10/17 ken mays
> Ian,
>
> Xnv_175a was the 'upstream' test build
Solved ;)
Found a coubple of rge compatible cards, just 60? each :)
Thanx!
--
Da: James Carlson
A: Discussion list for OpenIndiana
Data: 13 ottobre 2011 15.06.06 CEST
Oggetto: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] ce networks and a
Hi,
I recently could join an old Sun Sparc machine to an OpenIndiana storage, by
adding a couple of
ethernets to the Sparc machine running Solaris 10/08.
The Sparc machine is now connected to the storage switch, LACP capable.
I understand that dladm on Solaris 10 is still different from the OpenIn
Hi,
I was wondering what (if any) problems I may encounter by mixing different zfs
strategies on one pool,
with all equal disk sizes.
Examples:
- pool1: raidz1 a0 a1 a2 mirror a3 a4
- pool2: raidz1 b0 b1 b2 raidz1 b3 b4 b5 mirror b6 b7
- pool3: mirror c0 c1 mirror c2 c3 raidz c4 c5 c6
I'm just try
Gabriele Bulfon wrote:
> Hi,
> I recently could join an old Sun Sparc machine to an OpenIndiana storage, by
> adding a couple of
> ethernets to the Sparc machine running Solaris 10/08.
> The Sparc machine is now connected to the storage switch, LACP capable.
> I understand that dladm on Solaris 10
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 4:12 PM, Gabriele Bulfon wrote:
> Hi,
> I recently could join an old Sun Sparc machine to an OpenIndiana storage, by
> adding a couple of
> ethernets to the Sparc machine running Solaris 10/08.
> The Sparc machine is now connected to the storage switch, LACP capable.
> I u
Gabriele Bulfon wrote:
> Hi,
> I was wondering what (if any) problems I may encounter by mixing different
> zfs strategies on one pool,
> with all equal disk sizes.
> Examples:
> - pool1: raidz1 a0 a1 a2 mirror a3 a4
> - pool2: raidz1 b0 b1 b2 raidz1 b3 b4 b5 mirror b6 b7
> - pool3: mirror c0 c1 m
> In particular, what's the sharing policy ('dladm show-aggr -L')?
>
> My experience with S10 was that I only got both paths in use when
> I set the sharing policy to combine L2 and L3.
Yes, that is also my experience. Here is what I currently have for
configuration on the one aggregation I use m
I've just installed oi on a vm (virtualbox) as guest on an older P4
3.06 with 2gb ram an running Debian wheezy as HOST OS.
I gave the oi OS only 900mb of ram.
On reboot following install I'm seeing what seems to be inordinate sloth
in the boot process. As the services are being enumerated its ta
I've just installed oi 151 from the text based installer:
oi-dev-151a-text-x86.iso
To get a minimum basic gui desktop what pkgs would need to be
installed?
There is such a vast array of X related stuff to look through from the
command line, I'm having trouble figuring out what is basic. Some a
On Oct 16, 2011, at 10:09 PM, Mark Humphreys wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 6:49 PM, Robar Philip wrote:
>
>> Notice though that its 8 cores are not a win for builds, whereas the build
>> test is one of the few tests where the core i7 2600K really separates itself
>> from the rest of the pack—
Harry Putnam writes:
> I've just installed oi 151 from the text based installer:
> oi-dev-151a-text-x86.iso
>
> To get a minimum basic gui desktop what pkgs would need to be
> installed?
>
> There is such a vast array of X related stuff to look through from the
> command line, I'm having troubl
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 03:08, Harry Putnam wrote:
> I've just installed oi on a vm (virtualbox) as guest on an older P4
> 3.06 with 2gb ram an running Debian wheezy as HOST OS.
>
> I gave the oi OS only 900mb of ram.
>
> On reboot following install I'm seeing what seems to be inordinate sloth
> i
19 matches
Mail list logo
