Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] experimental or otherwise not recommended options for ZFS

2012-01-30 Thread Jan Owoc
Hi Robbie, On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 1:15 PM, Robbie Crash wrote: > If you want to use Fletcher, you need to use verify, as the likelihood of > collisions is increased since Fletcher is not *random*. You don't really > need to verify when using SHA256, and by default, SHA256 is used with > dedup,

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] experimental or otherwise not recommended options for ZFS

2012-01-30 Thread Robbie Crash
If you want to use Fletcher, you need to use verify, as the likelihood of collisions is increased since Fletcher is not *random*. You don't really need to verify when using SHA256, and by default, SHA256 is used with dedup, not Fletcher. . More information about the checksumming and trade-offs can

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] experimental or otherwise not recommended options for ZFS

2012-01-30 Thread Gary Gendel
Jan, I'm not sure that turning dedup or compression on is useful in your particular situation. Since the images are already compressed, re-compressing them only adds cpu overhead without much benefit. Also, Since images will have little opportunity for dedup (unless you tend to have multiple

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] experimental or otherwise not recommended options for ZFS

2012-01-30 Thread Jan Owoc
Thank you for the replies. On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 11:33 PM, Sašo Kiselkov wrote: > The obvious saying springs to mind: "RAID != backup". If you need your > data to be safe, have two copies of it in two geographically separate > locations running in two separate machines. I've read about ECC/non

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] experimental or otherwise not recommended options for ZFS

2012-01-29 Thread Sašo Kiselkov
On 01/30/2012 04:48 AM, Jan Owoc wrote: > Hi, > > I'm building a home NAS so I don't care too much about performance, > but *do* care if I lose all my photos. I'm aware that ZFS had a very > extensive test suite that ensured that data is kept safe. > > Are the newer capabilities (specifically che

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] experimental or otherwise not recommended options for ZFS

2012-01-29 Thread Robbie Crash
Someone can correct me if I'm not 100% accurate, but: Those features are thoroughly tested and not experimental. That said: nothing is guaranteed to keep your data safe, and if you're truly worried about it, don't use dedupe. In fact set ZFS to write multiple copies of everything. Create a ZFS poo

[OpenIndiana-discuss] experimental or otherwise not recommended options for ZFS

2012-01-29 Thread Jan Owoc
Hi, I'm building a home NAS so I don't care too much about performance, but *do* care if I lose all my photos. I'm aware that ZFS had a very extensive test suite that ensured that data is kept safe. Are the newer capabilities (specifically checksum=sha256, compression=on, dedup=verify) thoroughly