On Jun 22, 2011, at 4:16 PM, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> On 06/22/11 08:43 AM, Sriram Narayanan wrote:
>> "Slowlaris" was a term used only for the TCP/IP stack of Solaris 9.
>
> "Slowlaris" originally came out of the performance difference between
> SunOS 4.x and Solaris 2.0, a decade before Solar
On 06/22/11 08:43 AM, Sriram Narayanan wrote:
> "Slowlaris" was a term used only for the TCP/IP stack of Solaris 9.
"Slowlaris" originally came out of the performance difference between
SunOS 4.x and Solaris 2.0, a decade before Solaris 9. Later Solaris
releases improved things greatly - 2.3 or
I mostly recall seeing that statement around the transition period from
SunOS 4.x (later called Solaris 1.x) to SunOS 5.x (Solaris 2.x). This
was where Sun transitioned from a BSD style Unix to the AT&T Sys V style
Unix.
Also, admins were accustomed to the BSD userland, and not happy about
the ot
Hate replying to myself, but this typo got by me and needed correction...
On Jun 22, 2011, at 9:41 AM, Gregory Youngblood wrote:
> As for speed "feel", put a mostly idle linux system next to a mostly idle
> solaris system and linux will "feel" faster interactively. Load the two
> systems down
On Jun 22, 2011, at 8:43 AM, Sriram Narayanan wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 9:00 PM, Ken Gunderson wrote:
>> On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 19:24 +0530, Sriram Narayanan wrote:
>>> Hi everyone:
>>>
>>> I've been using openindiana as my primary desktop environment while I
>>> work on Belenix related de
On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 17:16 +0100, Colin Ellis wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I run OI 148 + patches on a sony laptop with 4GB of RAM using gnome as a
> desktop. I can say for me I don't notice any desktop slowness.
>
> A couple of points:
>
> -My graphics card is reasonably well supported.
Ditto.
> -My la
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 10:04 PM, Ken Gunderson wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 21:13 +0530, Sriram Narayanan wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 9:00 PM, Ken Gunderson wrote:
>> > On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 19:24 +0530, Sriram Narayanan wrote:
>> >> Hi everyone:
>> >>
>> >> I've been using openindiana a
On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 21:13 +0530, Sriram Narayanan wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 9:00 PM, Ken Gunderson wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 19:24 +0530, Sriram Narayanan wrote:
> >> Hi everyone:
> >>
> >> I've been using openindiana as my primary desktop environment while I
> >> work on Belenix r
Hi,
I run OI 148 + patches on a sony laptop with 4GB of RAM using gnome as a
desktop. I can say for me I don't notice any desktop slowness.
A couple of points:
-My graphics card is reasonably well supported.
-My laptop has plenty of ram - often an issue that can cause slowness as OI
loves to ca
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 9:00 PM, Ken Gunderson wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 19:24 +0530, Sriram Narayanan wrote:
>> Hi everyone:
>>
>> I've been using openindiana as my primary desktop environment while I
>> work on Belenix related development (illumos kernel, rpm, etc).
>>
>> I've not felt a si
On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 19:24 +0530, Sriram Narayanan wrote:
> Hi everyone:
>
> I've been using openindiana as my primary desktop environment while I
> work on Belenix related development (illumos kernel, rpm, etc).
>
> I've not felt a single slow down ever in my use of OI. I've used both
> build 1
Hi everyone:
I've been using openindiana as my primary desktop environment while I
work on Belenix related development (illumos kernel, rpm, etc).
I've not felt a single slow down ever in my use of OI. I've used both
build 147 as well as 148. IPS sucks for me given the low bandwidth and
the calcu
12 matches
Mail list logo
