On 2021-01-29 22:24, Toomas Soome via openindiana-discuss wrote:
On 30. Jan 2021, at 03:43, Chris wrote:
On 2021-01-29 17:18, Andy Fiddaman wrote:
On Fri, 29 Jan 2021, Chris wrote:
; OK just dragged a Dell Optiplex 790 off the shelf
; with a 4 core 8 thread i5 CPU in it, and as much RAM
; as I
> On 30. Jan 2021, at 03:43, Chris wrote:
>
> On 2021-01-29 17:18, Andy Fiddaman wrote:
>> On Fri, 29 Jan 2021, Chris wrote:
>> ; OK just dragged a Dell Optiplex 790 off the shelf
>> ; with a 4 core 8 thread i5 CPU in it, and as much RAM
>> ; as I could jam in it.
>> ; BIOS:
>> ; boot UEFI
>> ;
> On 30. Jan 2021, at 03:57, Gary Mills wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 05:02:21PM -0800, Chris wrote:
>> OK just dragged a Dell Optiplex 790 off the shelf
>> with a 4 core 8 thread i5 CPU in it, and as much RAM
>> as I could jam in it.
>> BIOS:
>> boot UEFI
>
> You can't do that. You have
> On 30. Jan 2021, at 06:52, Chris wrote:
>
> On 2021-01-29 17:57, Gary Mills wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 05:02:21PM -0800, Chris wrote:
>>> OK just dragged a Dell Optiplex 790 off the shelf
>>> with a 4 core 8 thread i5 CPU in it, and as much RAM
>>> as I could jam in it.
>>> BIOS:
>>>
On 2021-01-29 17:57, Gary Mills wrote:
On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 05:02:21PM -0800, Chris wrote:
OK just dragged a Dell Optiplex 790 off the shelf
with a 4 core 8 thread i5 CPU in it, and as much RAM
as I could jam in it.
BIOS:
boot UEFI
You can't do that. You have to boot OI in BIOS mode.
The
On 2021-01-29 17:57, Gary Mills wrote:
On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 05:02:21PM -0800, Chris wrote:
OK just dragged a Dell Optiplex 790 off the shelf
with a 4 core 8 thread i5 CPU in it, and as much RAM
as I could jam in it.
BIOS:
boot UEFI
You can't do that. You have to boot OI in BIOS mode.
The
On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 05:02:21PM -0800, Chris wrote:
> OK just dragged a Dell Optiplex 790 off the shelf
> with a 4 core 8 thread i5 CPU in it, and as much RAM
> as I could jam in it.
> BIOS:
> boot UEFI
You can't do that. You have to boot OI in BIOS mode.
The loader works in UEFI mode, but OI
On 2021-01-29 17:18, Andy Fiddaman wrote:
On Fri, 29 Jan 2021, Chris wrote:
; OK just dragged a Dell Optiplex 790 off the shelf
; with a 4 core 8 thread i5 CPU in it, and as much RAM
; as I could jam in it.
; BIOS:
; boot UEFI
; SATA ahci
; I've tried 2 different Nvidia cards, as well as the
; i
On Fri, 29 Jan 2021, Chris wrote:
; OK just dragged a Dell Optiplex 790 off the shelf
; with a 4 core 8 thread i5 CPU in it, and as much RAM
; as I could jam in it.
; BIOS:
; boot UEFI
; SATA ahci
; I've tried 2 different Nvidia cards, as well as the
; intermal video. The results are the same;
; 2
OK just dragged a Dell Optiplex 790 off the shelf
with a 4 core 8 thread i5 CPU in it, and as much RAM
as I could jam in it.
BIOS:
boot UEFI
SATA ahci
I've tried 2 different Nvidia cards, as well as the
intermal video. The results are the same;
2.5 minutes to get to the OI banner/boot options.
An
On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 11:50 PM Lou Picciano
wrote:
> Reg,
>
> As a guy partly responsible (apologies!) for the list being generally
> pretty quiet, the only contribution I can make to this at the moment is:
>
> Reg, You Da Man!
>
> (written from only a few miles from that Bell Labs you so right
Reg,
As a guy partly responsible (apologies!) for the list being generally pretty
quiet, the only contribution I can make to this at the moment is:
Reg, You Da Man!
(written from only a few miles from that Bell Labs you so rightly mentioned…)
Lou Picciano
> On Jan 29, 2021, at 4:47 PM, Regi
On 01/29/21 22:24, Toomas Soome via openindiana-discuss wrote:
On 29. Jan 2021, at 23:20, Stephan Althaus
wrote:
On 01/29/21 17:29, Chris wrote:
On 2021-01-28 23:38, Udo Grabowski (IMK) wrote:
On 29.01.21 06:48, Chris wrote:
Maybe I'm spoiled, because the (Free)BSD console(s)
are great. I
I have been ignoring this torrent of BS as patiently as I can, but I'm really
getting tired of it.
First of all, computing has a 75 year old history. There have been many false
starts and mistakes along the way. The failure of the new arrivals to learn
from the past results in the same mistak
On 2021-01-29 13:20, Stephan Althaus wrote:
On 01/29/21 17:29, Chris wrote:
On 2021-01-28 23:38, Udo Grabowski (IMK) wrote:
On 29.01.21 06:48, Chris wrote:
Maybe I'm spoiled, because the (Free)BSD console(s)
are great. I can CTRL+ALT+F(1-12) for a new session, and attack
several different task
> On 29. Jan 2021, at 23:20, Stephan Althaus
> wrote:
>
> On 01/29/21 17:29, Chris wrote:
>> On 2021-01-28 23:38, Udo Grabowski (IMK) wrote:
>>> On 29.01.21 06:48, Chris wrote:
Maybe I'm spoiled, because the (Free)BSD console(s)
are great. I can CTRL+ALT+F(1-12) for a new session, a
On 01/29/21 17:29, Chris wrote:
On 2021-01-28 23:38, Udo Grabowski (IMK) wrote:
On 29.01.21 06:48, Chris wrote:
Maybe I'm spoiled, because the (Free)BSD console(s)
are great. I can CTRL+ALT+F(1-12) for a new session, and attack
several different tasks simultaneously.
Guess I'm going to have to
On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 2:46 PM Jedi Tek’Unum wrote:
> EVERY OS in existence is getting really long in the tooth (outdated)
The irony of this is we're on the discussion list of an OS distribution
whose fundamental underpinnings are decades old and that is the
continuation of a legacy OS.
and fo
QNX is so far ahead of any other operating system, the fact that it hasn't
changed yet n the last 20 years is basically a good thing as it has finally
stabilised (after having had two completely breaking rewrites from scratch
in the prior 20 years).
Only now are operating systems like fuchsia and
EVERY OS in existence is getting really long in the tooth (outdated) and for
the most part hasn’t innovated in a very long time. Ideally they would ALL be
replaced.
I’m not comparing “Linux” (the hoard of many each slightly different) to
Illumos or derivatives specifically. My comment was purel
Am 29.01.21 um 19:59 schrieb Jason Long via openindiana-discuss:
Hello,
I installed the MATE desktop, but system can't boot in the graphical Desktop.
You'll need to enable lightdm:
pfexec svcadm enable lightdm
This should bring the graphical login.
Regards,
Andreas
Hello,
I installed the MATE desktop, but system can't boot in the graphical Desktop.
On Friday, January 29, 2021, 08:59:34 PM GMT+3:30, Jason Long via
openindiana-discuss wrote:
Thank you so much.
On Friday, January 29, 2021, 08:38:52 PM GMT+3:30, Andreas Wacknitz
wrote:
In message <6af404130fb7e202352aab33a4fad...@bsdos.info>, Chris writes:
>First off. To make something I can develop (OI) on.
If I was in your shoes, I would stick with FreeBSD as my daily
driver and do my OI porting and development on a bhyve VM.
John
groenv...@acm.org
__
Thank you so much.
On Friday, January 29, 2021, 08:38:52 PM GMT+3:30, Andreas Wacknitz
wrote:
Am 29.01.21 um 17:57 schrieb Jason Long via openindiana-discuss:
> Hello,
> I did below commands to install MATE Desktop:
> # pfexec pkg refresh --full
> # pfexec pkg image-update -v
> # pfe
Am 29.01.21 um 17:57 schrieb Jason Long via openindiana-discuss:
Hello,
I did below commands to install MATE Desktop:
# pfexec pkg refresh --full
# pfexec pkg image-update -v
# pfexec pkg mate_install
But, I got below error:
pkg: unknown subcommand 'mate_install'
mate_install is not a command b
On 2021-01-29 08:45, John D Groenveld wrote:
In message <91ecf33c60c1c9dcca392709ecd01...@bsdos.info>, Chris writes:
Thanks! I don't have any of that here. This sort of thing is
controlled by /etc/ttys on FreeBSD. I'm not sure what the equivalent
is on OI. Will have to look around and see what I
Jason Long via openindiana-discuss writes:
> I did below commands to install MATE Desktop:
> # pfexec pkg refresh --full
> # pfexec pkg image-update -v
> # pfexec pkg mate_install
Try "pfexec pkg install -v mate_install" or, if you want to do a dry
run first to see what it will do, specify "-nv"
Hello,
I did below commands to install MATE Desktop:
# pfexec pkg refresh --full
# pfexec pkg image-update -v
# pfexec pkg mate_install
But, I got below error:
pkg: unknown subcommand 'mate_install'
Why?
Thank you.
___
openindiana-discuss mailing li
In message <91ecf33c60c1c9dcca392709ecd01...@bsdos.info>, Chris writes:
>Thanks! I don't have any of that here. This sort of thing is
>controlled by /etc/ttys on FreeBSD. I'm not sure what the equivalent
>is on OI. Will have to look around and see what I can find.
https://wiki.openindiana.org/page
On 2021-01-28 23:38, Udo Grabowski (IMK) wrote:
On 29.01.21 06:48, Chris wrote:
Maybe I'm spoiled, because the (Free)BSD console(s)
are great. I can CTRL+ALT+F(1-12) for a new session, and attack
several different tasks simultaneously.
Guess I'm going to have to build all that into OI.
Fire up
On 2021-01-28 22:54, Stephan Althaus wrote:
On 01/29/21 07:48, Chris wrote:
On 2021-01-28 22:18, Toomas Soome via openindiana-discuss wrote:
On 29. Jan 2021, at 07:48, Chris wrote:
On 2021-01-28 19:48, Gary Mills wrote:
On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 05:35:38PM -0800, Chris wrote:
I'm trying to fi
On 01/29/21 13:10, Udo Grabowski (IMK) wrote:
On 29.01.21 11:52, Jim Klimov wrote:
On January 29, 2021 6:08:50 AM UTC, Stephan Althaus
wrote:
On 01/29/21 06:58, Chris wrote:
...
Taken this idea, to me it would make more sense to try to transform
joyent's pkgsrc,
as many these pkgs in there
On 29.01.21 13:39, Chris Game wrote:
On Thu, 28 Jan 2021, Chris wrote:
... fe; if you
build your
packages/applications from ports (source). You can NOT use package AT
ALL.
Conversely; if you install your applications from pkg(8). You can NOT
build
additional applications from ports/source. T
On Thu, 28 Jan 2021, Chris wrote:
While coming from FreeBSD makes me a bit biased. I think it's a good thing
to think/talk about. But be warned; FreeBSD pkg(8) comes with it's own set of
complications. Not something OI would want to inherit. fe; if you build your
packages/applications from p
On 29.01.21 11:52, Jim Klimov wrote:
On January 29, 2021 6:08:50 AM UTC, Stephan Althaus
wrote:
On 01/29/21 06:58, Chris wrote:
...
Taken this idea, to me it would make more sense to try to transform
joyent's pkgsrc,
as many these pkgs in there are known to build on illumos.
IF it is possi
On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 3:51 AM Hung Nguyen Gia via openindiana-discuss <
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org> wrote:
> What about just import the FreeBSD Ports system and like DragonflyBSD uses
> transformations scripts (https://github.com/DragonFlyBSD/DeltaPorts) to
> transform it into illumos-p
On January 29, 2021 6:08:50 AM UTC, Stephan Althaus
wrote:
>On 01/29/21 06:58, Chris wrote:
...
>Taken this idea, to me it would make more sense to try to transform
>joyent's pkgsrc,
>as many these pkgs in there are known to build on illumos.
>IF it is possible technically and a reasonable effor
37 matches
Mail list logo
