On 12/04/2015 10:15, Alexandr Akol'zin wrote:
Set hipster-2015. Created a zone. Publiher:
http://pkg.openindiana.org/hipster-2015/Publisher: Using openindiana.org
(http://pkg.openindiana.org/hipster-2015/ )
I try to set a zone and an error appears: A ZFS file system has been created
for
Set hipster-2015. Created a zone. Publiher:
http://pkg.openindiana.org/hipster-2015/ Publisher: Using openindiana.org
(http://pkg.openindiana.org/hipster-2015/ )
I try to set a zone and an error appears: A ZFS file system has been created
for this zone. Image: Preparing at /export/
Three honest and obvious questions:
1) Is "catch-up and consolidate" not the current plan ?
2) How realistic is it to freeze before having complete migration of the
consolidations (JDS+XNV+friends) to oi-userland ?
3) Who will handle the doubly workload ?
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 7:46 PM, Nikola M
On 12/ 3/15 01:39 PM, Alexander Pyhalov wrote:
As for /dev, I think it's not a big secret that it's efficiently dead.
If hipster _releases_ (starting with hipster freeze to be able to update
from /dev, instead just marching on like 2 years ago) land into /dev
then /dev is what /dev is.
It
Hipster - 2015 it and is there OpenIndiana 151a9? On howmany is she stable? Am
I washed off to set everything fromthe beginning? When I will set the adjusted
system, then Iwill begin to carry data. In hipster - 2015 in nonglobal zone
isit possible to set nfs server? John D Groenveld thank you fo
On 12/ 3/15 09:07 AM, Apostolos Syropoulos wrote:
I wonder where they got their time machine from - X.Org just barely
released Xorg 1.18:
This is of course irrelevant to my problem but that's what they state
in their site:
Added support for X.Org xserver ABI 20 (xorg-server 1.18).
So this wa
> I wonder where they got their time machine from - X.Org just barely
> released Xorg 1.18:
This is of course irrelevant to my problem but that's what they state
in their site:
Added support for X.Org xserver ABI 20 (xorg-server 1.18).
So this was my mistake. But since you are in the Xorg busi
In message <1449159227.445723419.6ekxo...@frv36.fwdcdn.com>, "Alexandr Akol'zin
" writes:
>Not quite clear! For setting exists only 151a8. Versions of the system 151a9 i
>t is not http://dlc.openindiana.org/isos/ . Do I need to change set publisher?
> What path do I need to specify, that to execute
Not quite clear! For setting exists only 151a8. Versions of the system 151a9 it
is not http://dlc.openindiana.org/isos/ . Do I need to change set publisher?
What path do I need to specify, that to execute dependences?
Alexander Pyhalov I very wait advice from you!
--- Исходное сообщение ---
Не совсем понятно! Для установки существует только 151A8. Версии системы 151A9
нет http://dlc.openindiana.org/isos/ . Мне нужно поменять set publisher? Какой
path мне нужно указать, чтоб выполнить зависимости? Alexander Pyhalov очень
жду от Вас совета!
--- Исходное сообщение ---
От кого: "Ale
On 12/ 3/15 03:51 AM, Apostolos Syropoulos via openindiana-discuss wrote:
Yesterday I checked the latest nVidia driver and it has support
for Xorg 1.20 and we still use Xorg 1.7
I wonder where they got their time machine from - X.Org just barely
released Xorg 1.18:
http://lists.x.org/archiv
That is the classical answer for ctime. James is correct. However some may find
it interesting to note that GPFS does indeed keep the original creation time as
an additional attribute that can then be used for policy applications. It is
not exposed to Unix, but it's there. Alas, GPFS is only ava
On 12/03/15 04:56, Peter Tribble wrote:
> You're mixing the various timestamps.
Indeed; that's the problem.
> access, shown by ls -lu
> modify (of data), shown by ls -l
> creation (or modify metadata), shown by ls -lc
Perhaps a nit, but one I think is important. UNIX (including
OpenIndiana) doe
3 декабря 2015 г. 12:51:53 CET, Apostolos Syropoulos via openindiana-discuss
пишет:
>> Hi Apostolos,
>>
>> have you tried w/o xorg.conf at all (I know, this is maybe stupid
>> question, but in past it has helped me to solve some weird issues)?
>>
>
>I have tried to boot with a DVD but again Xorg
3 декабря 2015 г. 12:31:54 CET, Apostolos Syropoulos via openindiana-discuss
пишет:
>
>
> Hello,
>
>I am trying to set up this Flatron E1942 monitor but
>
>no matter what modelines I have tried, Xorg refuses to start!
>Of course Windows works with no problem. Either the Xorg
>we are using is outd
On 12/03/2015 14:51, Apostolos Syropoulos via openindiana-discuss wrote:
Hi Apostolos,
have you tried w/o xorg.conf at all (I know, this is maybe stupid
question, but in past it has helped me to solve some weird issues)?
I have tried to boot with a DVD but again Xorg fails to start.
I assume
> Hi Apostolos,
>
> have you tried w/o xorg.conf at all (I know, this is maybe stupid
> question, but in past it has helped me to solve some weird issues)?
>
I have tried to boot with a DVD but again Xorg fails to start.
I assume this is the equivalent of trying without a configuration
file. Yest
On 12/ 3/15 12:31 PM, Apostolos Syropoulos via openindiana-discuss wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to set up this Flatron E1942 monitor but
no matter what modelines I have tried, Xorg refuses to start!
Of course Windows works with no problem. Either the Xorg
we are using is outdated to say the le
Hello,
I am trying to set up this Flatron E1942 monitor but
no matter what modelines I have tried, Xorg refuses to start!
Of course Windows works with no problem. Either the Xorg
we are using is outdated to say the least or it sucks in
general! I have also tried the "trick" at
http://www.x.
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 7:52 AM, Harry Putnam wrote:
> Not particularly and OI question but that is where I need this
> technique to work. I'm hoping some of you old shell hands will
> see the problem.
>
> I hope not to be exibiting true ignorance... but here I go.
>
> I keep messing with one for
is there a particular reason that you can't use just "-newer" ?
On 3 December 2015 at 09:34, Volker A. Brandt wrote:
> Hi Harry!
>
>
> > find scripts/perl/ -cnewer NewerThan -and ! -cnewer ButNotNewerThan
>
> Stupid question: Which find are you using? The -cnewer construct
> is Gnu find only
Hi Harry!
> find scripts/perl/ -cnewer NewerThan -and ! -cnewer ButNotNewerThan
Stupid question: Which find are you using? The -cnewer construct
is Gnu find only. The "regular" find in /usr/bin does not understand
it. Do you get something like "find: bad option -cnewer"?
Regards -- Volke
22 matches
Mail list logo
