Three honest and obvious questions: 1) Is "catch-up and consolidate" not the current plan ? 2) How realistic is it to freeze before having complete migration of the consolidations (JDS+XNV+friends) to oi-userland ? 3) Who will handle the doubly workload ?
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 7:46 PM, Nikola M <minik...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 12/ 3/15 01:39 PM, Alexander Pyhalov wrote: > >> >> As for /dev, I think it's not a big secret that it's efficiently dead. >> > > If hipster _releases_ (starting with hipster freeze to be able to update > from /dev, instead just marching on like 2 years ago) land into /dev then > /dev is what /dev is. > > It is not big secret that hipster is never planned for any kind of > production, so it goes both sides.. > > Having upgradeable releases out of hipster, that land into /dev could be > widely used. > > So not planning things and just doing updates to hipster without some > freeze for /dev update, does not help. > We need /dev because many people are not eager to update, say, twice a > day, but can chase releases and report bugs. > > > > _______________________________________________ > openindiana-discuss mailing list > openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org > http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss > -- --- Praise the Caffeine embeddings _______________________________________________ openindiana-discuss mailing list openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
