Yes, I remember looking at it for OpenSolaris.
Is it still usable on IllumOS/OI? I remember it didn't work correctly for some
reasons on IllumOS.
Is OI built with it?
--
Da: Dave Miner
A: openindiana-discuss@openindian
TDP does make the source code available. It should just be a matter of
determining dependencies, if any, and compiling.
After that, how much work does it take to make an IPS package? :)
--
.\\ark
___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discu
On Jun 2, 2011, at 5:29 AM, Ken Gunderson wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 15:51 -0400, Dan Swartzendruber wrote:
>> Apostolos Syropoulos wrote:
>>> http://blog.internetnews.com/skerner/2011/06/oracle-gives-openoffice-to-apa.html
>>>
>>> Of course the article is terrible and myopic since it assume
Yes, I have tweaked the block sizes on my virtual box guests zvols to get
the desired performance.
there are two factors that you may want to look at:
>
> 1) block size. files default to a 128K allocation block size, while
> zvols default to 8K.
>
> 2) check the "sync" property; the zvol may be
I've tried to set up mobile internet using Nokia N8-00 under OI b148,
but looks like system doesn't see my device...
I've expected that new device will be in /dev/N8 or smth like this as it
described in
http://blogs.oracle.com/jameslegg/entry/mobile_internet_under_opensolaris.
But looks like someth
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 11:21 AM, Apostolos Syropoulos wrote:
> First of all you have complained that nothing worked. If nothing works,
> then the next logical move is to use something where everything works.
If you kids can't stop arguing, I'll pull the list over to the side of the road
and make
>
> Yep. It's official. I'm too stupid and definitely not l337 enough for
> OpenIndiana so I should go use Windows or MacOS and not leech off of OI.
> Given this state of affairs, it's probably also amoral for me to remain
> subscribed to these lists and waste OI.org bandwidth.
>
> Thanks for h
On 06/ 2/11 07:18 AM, Gabriele Bulfon wrote:
Hi, don't know if this is a silly question, but I'd like to know if there is
any chance
to have an "installer tool" for bulding a customized installer of openindiana
that would
contain what I need by default, including additional software of mine.
On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 04:39 -0700, Apostolos Syropoulos wrote:
> > Unfortunately. For example, I'd really like to be using OI, OS, or
> > whatever. But reality is that Linux meets my needs on the desktop
> > workstation front _much_ better. So after much patience and testing of
> > oi-151b I've r
Shareholders should be pissed for getting the comunity go, in order to keep
the current value of the trademark up the project must stay alive, at this
very moment the only way they have to keep the project alive is investing
money into it... or maybe selling out the whole thing... otherwise, once t
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 12:59 PM, Gabriel de la Cruz
wrote:
> The name is the only thing Oracle owns at this moment...
> The rest is out there alrready.
>
> What they should do is to donate the trademark to the document foundation
> and stop messing around with the thing.
>
> :-O
Oracle owns much
The name is the only thing Oracle owns at this moment...
The rest is out there alrready.
What they should do is to donate the trademark to the document foundation
and stop messing around with the thing.
:-O
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 6:25 PM, Hillel Lubman wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 5:52
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 5:52 AM, Ken Gunderson wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 10:42 +0100, Jonathan Adams wrote:I'm of the opinion
> that LibreOffice would be taking a
> step backwards if it took on the Openoffice name. Folks know that
> LibreOffice is the path for future. The LibreOffice name i
Hello,
Ref:
ftp://download.nvidia.com/solaris/270.41.19/NVIDIA-Solaris-x86-270.41.19.run
Yes, the plan is to update OI IPS with the Nvidia 270.41.19 package for the
official oi_151 release as posted
on the OI wiki. I've manually tested both 270.41.19 and 275.09 (beta).
.
Please file a bug rep
> Well in cases like this I suggest people to switch to Windows or MacOS.
> In other words, people demand too much without contributing anything.
> A.S.
I cannot recommend Windows to anyone who doesn't have a specific need for it.
People who have not used Windows for a while can balk at the chang
> Unfortunately. For example, I'd really like to be using OI, OS, or
> whatever. But reality is that Linux meets my needs on the desktop
> workstation front _much_ better. So after much patience and testing of
> oi-151b I've reluctantly had to admit that I need to go with Debian
> until OI has co
Am 02.06.11 13:08, schrieb Gabriel de la Cruz:
> -The plan was so simple; we purchase sun, kick out the hippies, and make
> real business.
> -well...
> -Does this mean that we cannot sell corporate licenses of openoffice
> anymore?
> -well..
> -Did anyone wrote a plan B? anyone?...
> -...
> -What w
Hi, don't know if this is a silly question, but I'd like to know if there is
any chance
to have an "installer tool" for bulding a customized installer of openindiana
that would
contain what I need by default, including additional software of mine.
Thanks
Gabriele.
On 2 June 2011 12:08, Gabriel de la Cruz wrote:
> -What were those indians called?
> -Sir, do you mean Apaches?
> -Whatever, give it back to them...
> -...
+1 FTW
___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindia
-The plan was so simple; we purchase sun, kick out the hippies, and make
real business.
-well...
-Does this mean that we cannot sell corporate licenses of openoffice
anymore?
-well..
-Did anyone wrote a plan B? anyone?...
-...
-What were those indians called?
-Sir, do you mean Apaches?
-Whatever, g
I've just read (
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/06/01/oracle_openoffice_apache/page2.html
) that Oracle will retain the OpenOffice name, so basically they've
given Apache all the code and rights to change the licenses, and then
stopped developing ... way to go Oracle.
LibreOffice will be much b
On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 10:42 +0100, Jonathan Adams wrote:
> Apache didn't want OpenOffice originally according to press/blogs of
> people in the know ... probably because Apache got bitten over the
> whole Java thing.
>
> There was, however, a contract with Sun to keep maintaining and
> improving O
Apache didn't want OpenOffice originally according to press/blogs of
people in the know ... probably because Apache got bitten over the
whole Java thing.
There was, however, a contract with Sun to keep maintaining and
improving OpenOffice, which passed to Oracle, and after all the dev
team left an
On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 23:56 +0400, Andrey N. Oktyabrski wrote:
> On 01.06.11 23:42, Apostolos Syropoulos wrote:
> >> Is it possible to replace the nvidia driver packages 256.44 by the 270.41
> >> (from the NVIDIA site) in the openindiana.org IPS repository?
> >
> > Yes and I am using 270.41.06 but
On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 15:51 -0400, Dan Swartzendruber wrote:
> Apostolos Syropoulos wrote:
> >
> > http://blog.internetnews.com/skerner/2011/06/oracle-gives-openoffice-to-apa.html
> >
> > Of course the article is terrible and myopic since it assumes that the
> > center of
> > the universe is Lin
will they give opensolaris to apache as well :P
lol
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 10:51 PM, Dan Swartzendruber wrote:
> Apostolos Syropoulos wrote:
>
>>
>> http://blog.internetnews.com/skerner/2011/06/oracle-gives-openoffice-to-apa.html
>>
>> Of course the article is terrible and myopic since it assume
> Thanks for that. I'm actually going to try and teach myself to build it,
> because I need to learn. :-) But chances are I'll get stuck and need
> this!
>
> Just out of interest, if I do use this, how do I install these? Do I just
> search for lxde and do it one package at a time? Or is there
27 matches
Mail list logo
