Postfix is probably the easiest drop-in replacement. But IMO
a packaging of it should get lots of testing before going into
a stable distro, and regardless of which is eventually the
default or preferred choice, both should remain available.
I did poke around at this, but found that the fm
On Jan 25, 2011, at 10:22 PM, Ken Gunderson wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2011-01-25 at 10:58 -0800, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
>> On 01/25/11 10:50 AM, Ken Gunderson wrote:
>>> As for the MTA discussion, Postfix is pretty much a drop in replacement
>>> for Sendmail, and my vote would be to replace Sendmail e
Personally, whether it's sendmail, postfix, qmail or something else I
couldn't care less. We all have our MTA of choice.
For the mail server I pull whatever it is it out to run spamdyke/qmail
with an IMAP (dovecot) interface for access from all the other
machines. I've done it dozens of time
On Tue, 2011-01-25 at 10:58 -0800, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> On 01/25/11 10:50 AM, Ken Gunderson wrote:
> > As for the MTA discussion, Postfix is pretty much a drop in replacement
> > for Sendmail, and my vote would be to replace Sendmail entirely.
>
> I still don't understand this subthread - i
On 01/26/11 07:03 AM, Jonathan Adams wrote:
On 25 January 2011 17:32, Edward Martinez wrote:
Hi
in this month BSD (01/2011) issue, has an article comparing OpenIndiana to
the BSDs on the desktop.
the article starts on pg: 36 and it's a free download
OI is getting exposure :-)
http://bsdm
I did try CIDR masking, and it responds with "invalid IP address".
If that were to work, it would be good enough, but when it comes to
automation, quite a bit of logic to write. Even if I could
incrementally add to the list, that would be useful, but I do not see
a way to do that either.
Jonath
Jonathan -
Though we do use dladm quite a bit, haven't run into this limitation of the
allowed property...
On the other hand, doesn't this property accept CIDR masking; wouldn't this go
a long way toward consolidating your 'allowed' requirements?
Lou
- Original Message -
From:
I was wondering if anyone has insight into this problem I ran into.
While adjusting the link properties for an existing vnic, I found that
if you try to add more than 243 characters worth of comma separated IP
addresses to the allowed-ips= property, it results in the error
"dladm: property list t
On 01/25/11 13:52, Alasdair Lumsden wrote:
Hi Ken,
On 25 Jan 2011, at 18:50, Ken Gunderson wrote:
On Fri, 2011-01-14 at 20:36 +, Alasdair Lumsden wrote:
Hi All,
I believe now would be a really good time for us to create our first stable
branch of OpenIndiana, given the timing of some de
On Tue, 2011-01-25 at 21:52 +, Alasdair Lumsden wrote:
> Hi Ken,
>
> On 25 Jan 2011, at 18:50, Ken Gunderson wrote:
>
> >
> > On Fri, 2011-01-14 at 20:36 +, Alasdair Lumsden wrote:
> >> Hi All,
> >>
> >> I believe now would be a really good time for us to create our first
> >> stable
On Tuesday, 25 January, 2011 13:52, "Alasdair Lumsden"
said:
> You are right though about needing more software in our repos, and this is
> something we do intend to do via the OIAC project, please see:
>
> http://wiki.openindiana.org/display/~guido/OI+Extra+Consolidation
>
> If you'd like to
Am 25.01.11 19:58, schrieb Alan Coopersmith:
> On 01/25/11 10:50 AM, Ken Gunderson wrote:
>> As for the MTA discussion, Postfix is pretty much a drop in replacement
>> for Sendmail, and my vote would be to replace Sendmail entirely.
>
> I still don't understand this subthread - if someone wants t
Hi Ken,
On 25 Jan 2011, at 18:50, Ken Gunderson wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2011-01-14 at 20:36 +, Alasdair Lumsden wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I believe now would be a really good time for us to create our first stable
>> branch of OpenIndiana, given the timing of some developments within the
>> proj
On 01/25/11 10:50 AM, Ken Gunderson wrote:
> As for the MTA discussion, Postfix is pretty much a drop in replacement
> for Sendmail, and my vote would be to replace Sendmail entirely.
I still don't understand this subthread - if someone wants to start working
on postfix as a development project f
On Fri, 2011-01-14 at 20:36 +, Alasdair Lumsden wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I believe now would be a really good time for us to create our first stable
> branch of OpenIndiana, given the timing of some developments within the
> project.
Was a consensus ever reached on this?
Opinions are easier
Ta for the link ... It's interesting and probably fair :)
On 25 January 2011 17:32, Edward Martinez wrote:
> Hi
>
> in this month BSD (01/2011) issue, has an article comparing OpenIndiana to
> the BSDs on the desktop.
> the article starts on pg: 36 and it's a free download
>
> OI is getting ex
Hi
in this month BSD (01/2011) issue, has an article comparing
OpenIndiana to the BSDs on the desktop.
the article starts on pg: 36 and it's a free download
OI is getting exposure :-)
http://bsdmag.org/
___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenI
On 01/25/11 06:31, Daniel Kjar wrote:
installing from the bootable DVD iso, on the same machine, w/o
interfering with the existing OSol b134 environment
why not just run OpenIndiana in VIrtualbox?
___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-d
I have the three bits of software you mention installed and had no
problem with the upgrade. Just saying. Not sure what else you are
having issues with In fact my system is more stable now (throws far
fewer core dumps anyway).
On 01/25/11 08:27 AM, Hans J. Albertsson wrote:
I have an
Yes. You can use the install_openindiana script from here:
http://www.belenix.org/binfiles/install_openindiana
This will create a new BE and install a fresh copy of indiana in it. It
really is a life-saver.
Gary
On 1/25/11 8:27 AM, Hans J. Albertsson wrote:
I have an installation of OpenSo
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 14:27, Hans J. Albertsson
wrote:
> I have an installation of OpenSolaris b134, with lots of addons: SunRay
> Software, mplayer, VirtualBox... almost anything I could find got installed.
> Make no mistake: it is ALL useful to me and my users, so there isn't
> anything that c
I have an installation of OpenSolaris b134, with lots of addons: SunRay
Software, mplayer, VirtualBox... almost anything I could find got installed.
Make no mistake: it is ALL useful to me and my users, so there isn't
anything that can be removed out-of-hand.
But: We do want to move on! OI b148
Update...
The G11n consolidation code was to be updated to CLDR 1.9 which puts it more
inline with work elsewhere.
I took care of the fonts and a few other things.
This was by direction of the G11n team as I inquired about migrating to Unicode
6.x once released.
EveryCity/Illumos is collabor
23 matches
Mail list logo
