On 2014-08-05 00:51, Mario Arias wrote:
>
> We have been working on the medical vertical for some time now,
Have you been tracking GNU Health at all, or has there been too much
divergence?
Martin
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openerp-commun
On 2014-07-10 07:51, Franco Tampieri wrote:
>
> http://odoo-community.org/project/25
> https://github.com/OCA?query=manu
Hmm. Proposed by OCA or dreamed up by gurneyalex? Is there a written
convention or recommendation anywhere?
> Give me a valid reason to think that similar naming will be wrong
On 2014-07-10 01:49, Franco Tampieri wrote:
> So the final structure will be like that:
>
> -> Manifacture
> -> Manifacture (include workflow for MRP and MRP2, Materials etc. etc.)
> -> Manifacture-reporting (include al the report like better BOM
> representation or better Plan list of wor
On 2014-07-09 07:50, Nhomar Hernández wrote:
>
> Will we use three of them? Will we want separate them? Will we manage
> all in only 1 project?.
The mrp module includes both 'Material Requirements Planning' and
'Manufacturing'. Ideally it should be separated into 'Materials' and
'Manufacturing' m
On 2014-07-04 10:21, Leonardo "LeartS" Donelli wrote:
>
> Not really, I tried it in Firefox (30)
Interesting, so did I. Privoxy is blocking some key component. I'll have
to look into that.
Martin
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openerp-commu
On 2014-07-04 08:59, Leonardo "LeartS" Donelli wrote:
>
> It works for me, and it seems nice. Markdown support, images (with
> optional drag & drop), and not too much distractions.
It seems to need webkit based browsers. More work needed there.
Martin
__
On 2014-07-04 07:03, David Arnold - El Alemán wrote:
>
> I really don't understand why we don't explore the available tools out
> there in order to find something better and start a discussion about that.
What do the smart kids use?
AFAIK LKML and IRC.
Mailing list comes to me. I don't like havin
On 2014-07-04 06:26, Leonardo "LeartS" Donelli wrote:
>
> What you are describing is not correct bottom posting. You should only
> keep the relevant part of the previous message you're replying to, not
> everything. Like this.
Right, except you should keep the 'wrote' line, particularly if you
On 2014-07-03 07:26, Mariano Ruiz wrote:
> Sorry Martin but I disagree with you, the top-posting is the most
> practical way, makes more easy follow large threads, but it just my opinion.
Most people read from top to bottom. Forcing people to do otherwise is
rude. Which part of the long thread you
On 2014-07-03 07:03, Mariano Ruiz wrote:
> +1 avoid signatures with images and large slogans
And top-posting :-)
Sadly, for many people, the logos and disclaimers are added by corporate
dictat at the MTA so cannot be avoided.
Those replying should remove them though.
Martin
On 2014-06-27 08:22, Yannick Vaucher wrote:
>
> http://odoo-community.org/page/website.List
>
>> Edition & pubilshing
>
> Meaning of edition here is for printmaking
>
> So you think publish would be more appropriate ?
I think 'editing' is better, just as it is in the subtitle:
"Modules for the
On 2014-06-27 08:20, Joël Grand-Guillaume wrote:
>
> * The same for localization (here again:
> http://odoo-community.org/page/website.List). We prefix them all with
> "local-" so typing local will show all available one. e.g. "france"
> become "local-france"
I think 'locale' would be better.
M
On 2014-06-27 04:03, Yannick Vaucher wrote:
>
> I think we could take the opportunity to improve a bit our oca github
> repositories by renaming some of them to make them to fix some
> inconsistencies.
> edition-mgmt >> odoo-edition
What does 'edition' mean here? I'm not sure it's good English.
On 2014-06-23 17:45, David Arnold - El Alemán wrote:
>
> I see this mailing list as a somewhat ineffictient tool to organize
> discussion (and there are very valuable ones!).
As a 'hardliner fireplacer' I'd want to see a superior system before
supporting a switch. Never have yet.
> Comments in
On 2014-05-16 09:36, jeff.wang wrote:
> also this fantastic new name sounds silly in CHINESE, no one know how to
> spell it
>
> then we found this
>
> http://leloimg.lelo.netdna-cdn.com/graphic/LELO-Soraya-deep-rose-dual-action-vibrator.jpg
That's rather beautiful. I wonder if it will interface
On 2014-04-11 07:20, shazz0020 wrote:
> Hello ,
>
> I deleted few entries directly from pgadmin .
Inadvisable.
> Now when i restart my server with -u all -d database command , it throws
> following error:
>
> How i can resolve this critical issue?
>...
> 'Field product_tmpl_id not found in brow
On 2014-03-15 22:06, jeff.wang wrote:
>
> Yes, CSV is noupdate="0", this make me really fantastic surprises during
> implement the security access control.
Yeah, and they say ERP is boring ;-/
> each time you upgrade a module, all access come from CSV __REPLACE__ the
> ones you set up in your da
On 2014-03-06 03:10, Daniel Reis wrote:
>
> - The Documentation should be installed in modules, so that we can meet
> #2. (Jeff, I think this rules out the external wiki solution).
> - The Documentation should use the current OpenERP translations system
> - The Documentation should be able to use i
On 2014-02-27 17:24, Eric Caudal wrote:
> Somehow, I think every module should have a "doc" folder with a
> name_of_the_module_manual_en.pdf or name_of_the_module_manual_en.md
> inside (probably better pdf to be able to have screenshot and easy
> printing).
Python has reST and Docutils already. T
On 2014-02-14 05:00, Graeme Gellatly wrote:
>
> My final paper to complete my MBA is a research project. Currently my
> proposal revolves around a hypothesis that open source innovation limits
> internal innovation
How are you going to measure 'innovation'?
Martin
__
On 2014-01-31 07:51, Lionel Sausin wrote:
>
> I think Olivier Dony once said there was an scriptable upgrade feature
> already in the ORM, we should really start enforcing its use on OCA
> branhces. Does someone know how it works?
https://openupgrade-server.readthedocs.org/en/latest/
I used this
On 2014-01-28 17:50, Ian Beardslee wrote:
>
> The company (http://catalyst.net.nz) I work for has been asked to further
> investigate OpenERP for the use in a manufacturing process. That in
> itself is simple until the requirement that it must be workable for a
> blind user.
You don't say which v
On 2014-01-08 08:50, Sven Petersen wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to ask if there are References for industry-grade Weighing
> Scale (Bizerba, Avery-Berkel, …) Integrations in the food – processing
> industry?
I can't offer a reference but I have done this. You need to get your
scale on the net
On 2013-11-07 06:25, Raphael Valyi wrote:
>
> When you think that
> half OpenERP SA is India based, where they share the same issues, I
> cannot understand they sticked to bzr.
I too suffer from third-world resource contraints, but apart from the
bandwidth issue I quite like bzr.
> Are there peo
On 2013-10-31 19:15, Fabrice Henrion wrote:
>
> If you are interested and willing to help on this, we can run a round
> of Americanization on the terminology in OpenERP (like we did
> successfully before the v7 release). I can set up a pad where you
> could point out inconsistencies and we’ll take
On 2013-10-31 10:37, Pedro Manuel Baeza Romero wrote:
> Well, product_price_history then ;)
>
> However, I swear that I have seen this term a lot of times on software.
Mostly in OpenERP :-)
See also 'planification', 'unreconciliate', 'specificities'...
It's very tempting to tack on all those tric
On 2013-10-31 09:33, Pedro Manuel Baeza wrote:
>
> - We agreed about renaming to product_price_historization_by_company
To an Englishman like me 'historization' is a very ugly non-word. How
about just 'history'.
Martin
___
Mailing list: https://launc
On 2013-10-30 08:28, Frédéric Van Der Essen wrote:
>
> Offline mode is an interesting feature, but it has a very
> very high cost on the complexity and evolution of the pos. That is
> because supporting something offline means that we have to implement it
> in javascript in an interoperable way wit
On 2013-08-05 22:28, Dale Scott wrote:
>
> By custom, do you mean a custom third party module? Are there any
> you would recommend? Or do you mean a custom module I write?
One you write, or have written for you. There are third party ETL tools
like Kettle which can do the job in theory, but I'v
On 2013-08-05 14:59, Dale Scott wrote:
>
> Is this reasonable? Possible? I'd really appreciate some specific direction
> if anyone has some thoughts.
OpenERP uses the PostgreSQL database. It would be better to use that
rather than MySQL for your data integration. PostgreSQL has FDW that
would like
On 19/03/13 18:56, Jonathan Vargas wrote:
I checked group's permission on res.company object, on both development
and production databases, and they seem to be the same.
Sounds like you have missing permissions for some other object, perhaps the
bank info. The ORM will cause a cascading effect
On 15/03/13 17:16, Holger Brunn wrote:
I don't see any code changes that mandate those fields being not
null. Are you sure you didn't declare your field as required in
_columns = {}? That's not null. Required for input is on view level.
"required=True is deprecated: making an integer field"
"
On 15/03/13 11:10, Holger Brunn wrote:
To trick OpenERP into showing your custom error message: Declare an
_sql_constraint with the same name and your error message, then
throw it away on SQL level in your init function and create your own
constraint.
OK, seems to work without dropping the _sq
On 14/03/13 22:47, Holger Brunn wrote:
use a partial unique index:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/interactive/indexes-partial.html
Yes, that works. Thank you.
Not an ugly hack, but should suit your needs.
Well, before I had:
_sql_constraints = [
('variety_code_uniq', 'unique(variet
In 6.1 integers (and floats) are no longer allowed to be NULL. I
thought this was a bit high-handed at the time but it has not bitten me
until now.
I want NULL integers so I can have a unique constraint on the ones that
exist
and not care about the ones that don't.
What ugly hack am I going to
On 10/01/13 12:23, Serpent Consulting Services wrote:
Do you face that the timezone of user does never get considered? Its
always the timezone of browser/client pc and UTC/GMT are
considered.
I posted a patch for the screen reports.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/openobject-client/+bug/1074178
Ap
On 14/12/12 03:13, Eric Caudal wrote:
Not yet defined the scope but roughly this is an industrial customer
that needs to have:
- Lab test
- Sample management
- Chemical test with high level of definition
- Chemical tests will have to be checked with ranges defined in the product
- The lab and s
On 11/12/12 09:12, Houssine BAKKALI wrote:
It will add a not added value administrative work... While we can
agree that to be ported to a futur 7.1 or 8.0 branch the module
should have gained the status "installable = True" which tied more
to a Darwinist modules life cycle vision => evolve or di
2012/12/5 Eduardo Winter mailto:eduardo.win...@gmail.com>>
Has anyone has done report exports from OpenERP to ms Dos text
format with very specific spacing and sequenced document name
generating?. We need to export many reports to .txt from OpenERP
for automated bank payroll payments and governme
On 23/11/12 07:42, Niels Huylebroeck wrote:
My future utopia is a newly developed desktop client, which would
integrate better with newer desktops, is more portable to different
platforms and has support for server pushed plugins.
I would like to hear from NaN-tic, as Koo could fulfill this dr
On 16/10/12 08:36, Nils Rumprecht wrote:
So either its a bug or confusing design.
It's a buggy design.
Martin
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openerp-community
Post to : openerp-community@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launc
On 14/10/12 22:32, Carlos Guerrero wrote:
Since we can actually have web inside GTK using webkit, all the
"only-possible-with-web-technologies" modules, could use this webkit
container to be shown in the GTK client, just like they where
directly in a normal web browser.
...
I know this wouldn't
On 11/10/12 02:03, Fabien Pinckaers wrote:
- the web client is faster (especially if not standalone in v7.0)
- the v7.0 web client is so good that nobody will want to use GTK
anymore
If either of those things are actually true I will be amazed.
Martin
43 matches
Mail list logo
