On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 2:45 PM, Matthijs Vader
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> umount will fail if there are processes accessing files at the device, use
> lazy umount to avoid this problem.
>
> I found this patch [1] a long long time ago, but don't see it in master now.
>
> Any reason why it was not accepted?
Hi,
umount will fail if there are processes accessing files at the device, use lazy
umount to avoid this problem.
I found this patch [1] a long long time ago, but don't see it in master now.
Any reason why it was not accepted? Is there any harm in using lazy umount?
I know that it is not a 100
