On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 2:45 PM, Matthijs Vader <mva...@victronenergy.com> wrote: > Hi, > > umount will fail if there are processes accessing files at the device, use > lazy umount to avoid this problem. > > I found this patch [1] a long long time ago, but don't see it in master now. > > Any reason why it was not accepted? Is there any harm in using lazy umount? > > I know that it is not a 100% solution, and that it is best to make the user > trigger an umount before taking a card out. But that will not be done every > time. > > And without lazy unmount, the device will never be unmounted, causing the > next mount (triggered by an insert) to fail as well. > > See also the discussion on our own issue tracker [2]. > > [1] > http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/2010-June/066241.html
I guess we missed it when we started OE-Core project out of classic OE if you prepare and send this patch to OE-core after reviving it. I am sure we will take a look again. > > [2] https://github.com/victronenergy/venus/issues/59 > > Best regards, > > Matthijs > > -- > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core > -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core