On Sat, 21 Feb 2015, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 2:43 AM, Robert P. J. Day
> wrote:
> >
> > once a SRC_URI refers to an .scc file that further refers to a
> > .cfg file, is there any need for the SRC_URI file to
> > *additionally* refer explicitly to that same .cfg file? i
On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 2:43 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> once a SRC_URI refers to an .scc file that further refers to a .cfg
> file, is there any need for the SRC_URI file to *additionally* refer
> explicitly to that same .cfg file? i ask only because i've noticed
> this on occasion and i'm
once a SRC_URI refers to an .scc file that further refers to a .cfg
file, is there any need for the SRC_URI file to *additionally* refer
explicitly to that same .cfg file? i ask only because i've noticed
this on occasion and i'm not sure if there's something subtle going on
that i don't know abo
