On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 2:43 AM, Robert P. J. Day <rpj...@crashcourse.ca> wrote: > > once a SRC_URI refers to an .scc file that further refers to a .cfg > file, is there any need for the SRC_URI file to *additionally* refer > explicitly to that same .cfg file? i ask only because i've noticed > this on occasion and i'm not sure if there's something subtle going on > that i don't know about.
There's no need. Everything is migrated into the kernel workdir, and the .scc processing picks up the .cfg. It's that way, since the .scc + .cfgs are used elsewhere and in that format are fully standalone. Cheers, Bruce > > rday > > -- > > ======================================================================== > Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA > http://crashcourse.ca > > Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday > LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday > ======================================================================== > -- > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core -- "Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await thee at its end" -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
