Re: [OE-core] Machine dependencies validation with sstate

2012-02-22 Thread Martin Jansa
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 02:44:47PM +0100, Martin Jansa wrote: > On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 05:22:09PM +, Richard Purdie wrote: > > In the process of diving into the issues in bug 1916 > > (http://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1916), I've come up > > with a good way of detecting machine

Re: [OE-core] Machine dependencies validation with sstate

2012-02-16 Thread Martin Jansa
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 02:44:47PM +0100, Martin Jansa wrote: > On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 05:22:09PM +, Richard Purdie wrote: > > In the process of diving into the issues in bug 1916 > > (http://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1916), I've come up > > with a good way of detecting machine

Re: [OE-core] Machine dependencies validation with sstate

2012-02-16 Thread Martin Jansa
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 02:44:47PM +0100, Martin Jansa wrote: > On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 05:22:09PM +, Richard Purdie wrote: > > In the process of diving into the issues in bug 1916 > > (http://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1916), I've come up > > with a good way of detecting machine

Re: [OE-core] Machine dependencies validation with sstate

2012-02-16 Thread Martin Jansa
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 05:22:09PM +, Richard Purdie wrote: > In the process of diving into the issues in bug 1916 > (http://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1916), I've come up > with a good way of detecting machine specific changes to generic > PACKAGE_ARCH packages. > > The idea is

Re: [OE-core] Machine dependencies validation with sstate

2012-02-03 Thread Richard Purdie
On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 16:48 +, McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote: > Have you found an easy way to traverse up a dependency chain to the > initial signature? It can take a while running the above command until > you get to the *real* signature change on not just a signature change > because one of

Re: [OE-core] Machine dependencies validation with sstate

2012-01-30 Thread McClintock Matthew-B29882
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 11:22 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: > > rm tmp/stamps/*/*sigdata* > MACHINE=qemux86 bitbake core-image-sato -S > find tmp/stamps/i586-poky-linux/ -name \*sigdata* | sort > l1 > find tmp/stamps/all-poky-linux/ -name \*sigdata* | sort >> l1 > MACHINE=qemux86copy bitbake core-imag

[OE-core] Machine dependencies validation with sstate

2012-01-24 Thread Richard Purdie
In the process of diving into the issues in bug 1916 (http://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1916), I've come up with a good way of detecting machine specific changes to generic PACKAGE_ARCH packages. The idea is to have two identical machines, qemux86 and qemux86copy. These can be setup