On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 11:27:15PM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-07-12 at 14:34 -0700, akuster808 wrote:
> >
> > On 07/12/2016 02:24 PM, Burton, Ross wrote:
> > > On 12 July 2016 at 22:14, akuster808 wrote:
> > >
> > > > > Personally I was thinking that gcc 5.x and 6.x should stay
On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 3:27 PM, Richard Purdie
wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-07-12 at 14:34 -0700, akuster808 wrote:
>>
>> On 07/12/2016 02:24 PM, Burton, Ross wrote:
>> > On 12 July 2016 at 22:14, akuster808 wrote:
>> >
>> > > > Personally I was thinking that gcc 5.x and 6.x should stay in
>> > > > oe-
On Tue, 2016-07-12 at 14:34 -0700, akuster808 wrote:
>
> On 07/12/2016 02:24 PM, Burton, Ross wrote:
> > On 12 July 2016 at 22:14, akuster808 wrote:
> >
> > > > Personally I was thinking that gcc 5.x and 6.x should stay in
> > > > oe-core for
> > > > this cycle, and then drop 5.x after the relea
On 07/12/2016 02:24 PM, Burton, Ross wrote:
> On 12 July 2016 at 22:14, akuster808 wrote:
>
>>> Personally I was thinking that gcc 5.x and 6.x should stay in oe-core for
>>> this cycle, and then drop 5.x after the release.
>>
>>
>> Wouldn't that be dropped iff GCC 7.0 is release? or are you say
On 12 July 2016 at 22:14, akuster808 wrote:
> > Personally I was thinking that gcc 5.x and 6.x should stay in oe-core for
> > this cycle, and then drop 5.x after the release.
>
>
> Wouldn't that be dropped iff GCC 7.0 is release? or are you saying we
> should only have one GCC version?
>
Well, d
On 07/12/2016 01:15 AM, Burton, Ross wrote:
> On 12 July 2016 at 08:57, Gary Thomas wrote:
>
>> Now that GCC 4.x is gone, we're left with (currently) 5.4 & 6.1
>> Is the intention to track these both for a while, or will 5.x
>> also be gone once things are working with 6.x?
>>
>> ... just wonde
On 12 July 2016 at 08:57, Gary Thomas wrote:
> Now that GCC 4.x is gone, we're left with (currently) 5.4 & 6.1
> Is the intention to track these both for a while, or will 5.x
> also be gone once things are working with 6.x?
>
> ... just wondering where to spend my effort since I'll have to
> make
Now that GCC 4.x is gone, we're left with (currently) 5.4 & 6.1
Is the intention to track these both for a while, or will 5.x
also be gone once things are working with 6.x?
... just wondering where to spend my effort since I'll have to
make my targets (some are very old) work with at least 5.x
A
