On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 9:48 AM, Thomas Petazzoni
wrote:
> Dear Khem Raj,
>
> On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 11:22:24 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
>
>> it has been under my radar for a while. I have actually locally made
>> toolchains with
>> clang+musl and it seems to be coming along. its licensed differently tha
>
>
> I saw that yesterday too and thought it could be interesting for
> Yocto. I'm curious as to why it's better than uclibc though
> (genuinely curious, I know little about uclibc beyond "it's smaller").
>
It been a while since I've reviewed uclibc, but doesn't it break a lot of
software with i