Re: [OE-core] [yocto] OpenEmbedded and musl-libc

2014-03-26 Thread Khem Raj
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 9:48 AM, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > Dear Khem Raj, > > On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 11:22:24 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > >> it has been under my radar for a while. I have actually locally made >> toolchains with >> clang+musl and it seems to be coming along. its licensed differently tha

Re: [OE-core] [yocto] OpenEmbedded and musl-libc

2014-03-21 Thread Seth Bollinger
> > > I saw that yesterday too and thought it could be interesting for > Yocto. I'm curious as to why it's better than uclibc though > (genuinely curious, I know little about uclibc beyond "it's smaller"). > It been a while since I've reviewed uclibc, but doesn't it break a lot of software with i