On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 9:48 AM, Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazz...@free-electrons.com> wrote: > Dear Khem Raj, > > On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 11:22:24 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > >> it has been under my radar for a while. I have actually locally made >> toolchains with >> clang+musl and it seems to be coming along. its licensed differently thats >> the biggest attraction for folks who do static linking. Otherwise it still >> doesnt yet support variety of architectures that other libcs support. given >> now we have kconfig for eglibc too may be it fills in the nommu gap much >> like uclibc does today. > > The non-MMU gap? Last time I looked, musl didn't had support for any > non-MMU architecture.
yes it does not. I meant to state the reverse that mmu-less systems is where uclibc will have edge left. -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
