Sorry to reply to myself but I forgot one thing..
On Apr 7, 2011, at 10:05 AM, "Hatle, Mark" wrote:
>
>
>
>
> On Apr 7, 2011, at 9:53 AM, "Colin Walters" wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 12:10 PM, Hatle, Mark
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I think definition may be an issue here. When I speak o
Op 7 apr 2011, om 18:53 heeft Colin Walters het volgende geschreven:
> On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 12:10 PM, Hatle, Mark wrote:
>>
>> I think definition may be an issue here. When I speak of multilibs I am
>> talking primarily about multiliple non-conflicting, ABI incompatible
>> libraries being
On Apr 7, 2011, at 9:53 AM, "Colin Walters" wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 12:10 PM, Hatle, Mark wrote:
>>
>> I think definition may be an issue here. When I speak of multilibs I am
>> talking primarily about multiliple non-conflicting, ABI incompatible
>> libraries being installed at t
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 12:10 PM, Hatle, Mark wrote:
>
> I think definition may be an issue here. When I speak of multilibs I am
> talking primarily about multiliple non-conflicting, ABI incompatible
> libraries being installed at the same time. This is the ELF 32 and ELF 64
> case where the i
On Apr 7, 2011, at 8:36 AM, "Colin Walters" wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 7:02 AM, Richard Purdie
> wrote:
>> One of the items on our post 1.0 schedule is multilib and we need a plan
>> of implementation. I've been thinking about this for a while and at
>> least have some ideas how some of
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 7:02 AM, Richard Purdie
wrote:
> One of the items on our post 1.0 schedule is multilib and we need a plan
> of implementation. I've been thinking about this for a while and at
> least have some ideas how some of the issues can be handled.
>
> In case anyone isn't familiar wi
"Hatle, Mark" writes:
> On Apr 6, 2011, at 5:06 AM, "Richard Purdie"
> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 09:08 +0200, Esben Haabendal wrote:
>>> Richard Purdie writes:
>>>
One of the items on our post 1.0 schedule is multilib and we need a plan
of implementation. I've been thinking
"Hatle, Mark" writes:
> On Apr 6, 2011, at 5:06 AM, "Richard Purdie"
> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 09:08 +0200, Esben Haabendal wrote:
>>> Richard Purdie writes:
>>>
One of the items on our post 1.0 schedule is multilib and we need a plan
of implementation. I've been thinking
On Apr 6, 2011, at 7:29 AM, "Richard Purdie"
wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 10:47 +0200, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote:
>> I think most embedded systems would only use one lib. To take your
>> lib/lib64 example:
>> If I am developing for an embedded system I know whether it will run
>> as 32 or 6
On Apr 6, 2011, at 5:06 AM, "Richard Purdie"
wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 09:08 +0200, Esben Haabendal wrote:
>> Richard Purdie writes:
>>
>>> One of the items on our post 1.0 schedule is multilib and we need a plan
>>> of implementation. I've been thinking about this for a while and at
Richard Purdie writes:
> On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 15:21 +0200, Esben Haabendal wrote:
>> Richard Purdie writes:
>>
>> > On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 14:16 +0200, Esben Haabendal wrote:
>> > I actually believe the core in OE is well suited to multilib support and
>> > using it will show off some of the po
On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 15:21 +0200, Esben Haabendal wrote:
> Richard Purdie writes:
>
> > On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 14:16 +0200, Esben Haabendal wrote:
> > I actually believe the core in OE is well suited to multilib support and
> > using it will show off some of the power in the OE architecture as I
Richard Purdie writes:
> On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 14:16 +0200, Esben Haabendal wrote:
>> Richard Purdie writes:
>>
>> > On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 09:08 +0200, Esben Haabendal wrote:
>> >> Richard Purdie writes:
>> >>
>> >> > One of the items on our post 1.0 schedule is multilib and we need a plan
>>
On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 14:16 +0200, Esben Haabendal wrote:
> Richard Purdie writes:
>
> > On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 09:08 +0200, Esben Haabendal wrote:
> >> Richard Purdie writes:
> >>
> >> > One of the items on our post 1.0 schedule is multilib and we need a plan
> >> > of implementation. I've been
Richard Purdie writes:
> On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 09:08 +0200, Esben Haabendal wrote:
>> Richard Purdie writes:
>>
>> > One of the items on our post 1.0 schedule is multilib and we need a plan
>> > of implementation. I've been thinking about this for a while and at
>> > least have some ideas how s
On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 09:08 +0200, Esben Haabendal wrote:
> Richard Purdie writes:
>
> > One of the items on our post 1.0 schedule is multilib and we need a plan
> > of implementation. I've been thinking about this for a while and at
> > least have some ideas how some of the issues can be handled
16 matches
Mail list logo
