Re: [OE-core] [RESEND PATCH] mesa: upgrade 10.6.3 -> 11.1.1

2016-02-08 Thread Jussi Kukkonen
On 5 February 2016 at 22:55, Nicolas Dechesne wrote: > On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 9:46 PM, Burton, Ross > wrote: > > On 5 February 2016 at 20:44, Khem Raj wrote: > >> > >> its added new to this version. May be packageconfig is better place > >> for --with-sha1 stuff > > > > > > Agreed - some may no

Re: [OE-core] [RESEND PATCH] mesa: upgrade 10.6.3 -> 11.1.1

2016-02-05 Thread Richard Purdie
On Fri, 2016-02-05 at 21:04 +, Burton, Ross wrote: > Hi, > > On 5 February 2016 at 20:55, Nicolas Dechesne < > nicolas.deche...@linaro.org> wrote: > > > Agreed - some may not want openssl at all and being able to > > switch it for > > > another alternative would be useful. > > > > sure. but,

Re: [OE-core] [RESEND PATCH] mesa: upgrade 10.6.3 -> 11.1.1

2016-02-05 Thread Andre McCurdy
On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 1:04 PM, Burton, Ross wrote: > Hi, > > On 5 February 2016 at 20:55, Nicolas Dechesne > wrote: >> >> > Agreed - some may not want openssl at all and being able to switch it >> > for >> > another alternative would be useful. >> >> sure. but, then I have some questions.. >> >>

Re: [OE-core] [RESEND PATCH] mesa: upgrade 10.6.3 -> 11.1.1

2016-02-05 Thread Burton, Ross
Hi, On 5 February 2016 at 20:55, Nicolas Dechesne wrote: > > Agreed - some may not want openssl at all and being able to switch it for > > another alternative would be useful. > > sure. but, then I have some questions.. > > 1. which one we default to? openssl? > > 2. which one we support, from c

Re: [OE-core] [RESEND PATCH] mesa: upgrade 10.6.3 -> 11.1.1

2016-02-05 Thread Nicolas Dechesne
On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 9:46 PM, Burton, Ross wrote: > On 5 February 2016 at 20:44, Khem Raj wrote: >> >> its added new to this version. May be packageconfig is better place >> for --with-sha1 stuff > > > Agreed - some may not want openssl at all and being able to switch it for > another alternati

Re: [OE-core] [RESEND PATCH] mesa: upgrade 10.6.3 -> 11.1.1

2016-02-05 Thread Burton, Ross
On 5 February 2016 at 20:44, Khem Raj wrote: > its added new to this version. May be packageconfig is better place > for --with-sha1 stuff > Agreed - some may not want openssl at all and being able to switch it for another alternative would be useful. Ross -- __

Re: [OE-core] [RESEND PATCH] mesa: upgrade 10.6.3 -> 11.1.1

2016-02-05 Thread Khem Raj
On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 12:40 PM, Nicolas Dechesne wrote: > * update SRC_URI and checksum. > * use libcrypto for sha1 functions. In upstream commit a24bdce4, support for > SHA-1 was copied from xserver repo, so let's use the same default for > --with-sha1 option that we use in xserver recipe in

[OE-core] [RESEND PATCH] mesa: upgrade 10.6.3 -> 11.1.1

2016-02-05 Thread Nicolas Dechesne
* update SRC_URI and checksum. * use libcrypto for sha1 functions. In upstream commit a24bdce4, support for SHA-1 was copied from xserver repo, so let's use the same default for --with-sha1 option that we use in xserver recipe in OE core. Signed-off-by: Nicolas Dechesne --- meta/recipes-grap