Hi, On 5 February 2016 at 20:55, Nicolas Dechesne <nicolas.deche...@linaro.org> wrote:
> > Agreed - some may not want openssl at all and being able to switch it for > > another alternative would be useful. > > sure. but, then I have some questions.. > > 1. which one we default to? openssl? > > 2. which one we support, from configure.ac: > > [choose SHA1 implementation])]) > case "x$with_sha1" in > x | xlibc | xlibmd | xlibnettle | xlibgcrypt | xlibcrypto | xlibsha1 | > xCommonCrypto | xCryptoAPI) > ;; > nettle / gcrypt / crypto are all in oe-core. I presume that's BSD's "throw it all in" libc. nettle seems nice and low down the stack and modern. > 3. is there a good way to handle 'multiple choice' with PACKAGECONFIG? > How can we prevent more than 1 PACKAGECONFIG to be set (nicely)? With a comment saying "pick one of these", and nothing in the disabled case. Ross
-- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
