On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 02:58:23AM -0700, Gary Thomas wrote:
> On 2013-02-05 06:14, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 8:29 AM, Gary Thomas wrote:
> >> On 2013-02-04 08:12, Constantin Musca wrote:
> >>>
> >>> - netbase should only include etc-rpc, etc-protocols, etc-services
> >>> a
On 2013-02-05 06:14, Otavio Salvador wrote:
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 8:29 AM, Gary Thomas wrote:
On 2013-02-04 08:12, Constantin Musca wrote:
- netbase should only include etc-rpc, etc-protocols, etc-services
and the hosts file
- the init script/configuration files should be in another package
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 8:29 AM, Gary Thomas wrote:
> On 2013-02-04 08:12, Constantin Musca wrote:
>>
>> - netbase should only include etc-rpc, etc-protocols, etc-services
>> and the hosts file
>> - the init script/configuration files should be in another package
>> (init-ifupdown)
>
>
> What is th
On 2013-02-04 08:12, Constantin Musca wrote:
- netbase should only include etc-rpc, etc-protocols, etc-services
and the hosts file
- the init script/configuration files should be in another package
(init-ifupdown)
What is the benefit of such an intrusive change?
Why not just have the netbase re
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 05:12:03PM +0200, Constantin Musca wrote:
> - netbase should only include etc-rpc, etc-protocols, etc-services
> and the hosts file
> - the init script/configuration files should be in another package
> (init-ifupdown)
>
> [YOCTO #2486]
>
> Signed-off-by: Constantin Musca
- netbase should only include etc-rpc, etc-protocols, etc-services
and the hosts file
- the init script/configuration files should be in another package
(init-ifupdown)
[YOCTO #2486]
Signed-off-by: Constantin Musca
---
meta/conf/layer.conf | 1 +
.../init-ifupdown
