On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 02:58:23AM -0700, Gary Thomas wrote: > On 2013-02-05 06:14, Otavio Salvador wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 8:29 AM, Gary Thomas <g...@mlbassoc.com> wrote: > >> On 2013-02-04 08:12, Constantin Musca wrote: > >>> > >>> - netbase should only include etc-rpc, etc-protocols, etc-services > >>> and the hosts file > >>> - the init script/configuration files should be in another package > >>> (init-ifupdown) > >> > >> > >> What is the benefit of such an intrusive change? > >> Why not just have the netbase recipe create a separate package? > > > > Many images use different network managers so ifupdown might not be > > need; thus the split. Is it what you're concerned about? > > The massive renames and new recipe. I think it should be possible > to split the ifup/ifdown functions and keep the 'netbase' recipe.
But ifup/ifdown are sometimes MACHINE_ARCH and the rest is TUNE_PKGARCH. So it makes sense to split them. -- Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: martin.ja...@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
