On Sat, 22 Oct 2022 at 05:07, Khem Raj wrote:
>>> we should apply the v1 of patch and move on.
>>
>>
>> No again. Riscv32 is already listed so it’s on you to use existing mapping
>> to use those entries, and not add new ones.
>
>
> ?
> v1 is passing the needed options via cflags. No patching nee
On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 7:58 PM Alexander Kanavin
wrote:
>
>
> On Fri 21. Oct 2022 at 23.49, Khem Raj wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 2:01 PM Alexander Kanavin
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Fri, 21 Oct 2022 at 22:05, Khem Raj wrote:
>> > > Update the arch part of tuple to consider OE's names
>> >
On Fri 21. Oct 2022 at 23.49, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 2:01 PM Alexander Kanavin
> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 21 Oct 2022 at 22:05, Khem Raj wrote:
> > > Update the arch part of tuple to consider OE's names
> > > for riscv32
> >
> > > +--- a/vendor/crossbeam-utils-0.8.8/no_atomic.r
On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 2:01 PM Alexander Kanavin
wrote:
>
> On Fri, 21 Oct 2022 at 22:05, Khem Raj wrote:
> > Update the arch part of tuple to consider OE's names
> > for riscv32
>
> > +--- a/vendor/crossbeam-utils-0.8.8/no_atomic.rs
> > b/vendor/crossbeam-utils-0.8.8/no_atomic.rs
> > +@@ -
On Fri, 21 Oct 2022 at 22:05, Khem Raj wrote:
> Update the arch part of tuple to consider OE's names
> for riscv32
> +--- a/vendor/crossbeam-utils-0.8.8/no_atomic.rs
> b/vendor/crossbeam-utils-0.8.8/no_atomic.rs
> +@@ -49,6 +49,8 @@ const NO_ATOMIC_64: &[&str] = &[
> + "powerpc-wrs-vxwor
Update the patch to apply to only 0.8.8 version
Update the arch part of tuple to consider OE's names
for riscv32
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj
---
- Add riscv32-* to known arches for crossbeam-utils
.../rust/rust/crossbeam_atomic.patch | 57 ++-
1 file changed, 16 insertions(
