On Sat, 22 Oct 2022 at 05:07, Khem Raj <raj.k...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> we should apply the v1 of patch and move on. >> >> >> No again. Riscv32 is already listed so it’s on you to use existing mapping >> to use those entries, and not add new ones. > > > ? > v1 is passing the needed options via cflags. No patching needed. If you have > better suggestions come up with a better patch
Ah, gmail showed me v3 as v1. Sorry. The mapping (which is being done in two places, in meta/lib/oe/rust.py and in rust-target-config.bbclass), the patch to crossbeam and the triplet list in crossbeam's upstream are supposed to work together. So the correct fix is to expand the mapping with a riscv32 entry, and if it does not fix the issue, then figure out why is that. Your patch bypasses all of that and brings us back to manually maintaining exceptions, because? Alex
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#172059): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/172059 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/94484005/21656 Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
