On Mon, 2016-01-11 at 12:00 -0800, Andre McCurdy wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 11:52 AM, Khem Raj
> wrote:
> >
> > > On Jan 11, 2016, at 11:05 AM, Andre McCurdy
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sat, Jan 9, 2016 at 8:42 AM, Richard Purdie
> > > wrote:
> > > > xz compresses with a better compressi
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
>
>> On Jan 11, 2016, at 12:00 PM, Andre McCurdy wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 11:52 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
>>>
On Jan 11, 2016, at 11:05 AM, Andre McCurdy wrote:
On Sat, Jan 9, 2016 at 8:42 AM, Richard Purdie
wrote:
>>>
> On Jan 11, 2016, at 12:00 PM, Andre McCurdy wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 11:52 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
>>
>>> On Jan 11, 2016, at 11:05 AM, Andre McCurdy wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jan 9, 2016 at 8:42 AM, Richard Purdie
>>> wrote:
xz compresses with a better compression ratio than gz w
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 11:52 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
>
>> On Jan 11, 2016, at 11:05 AM, Andre McCurdy wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Jan 9, 2016 at 8:42 AM, Richard Purdie
>> wrote:
>>> xz compresses with a better compression ratio than gz with similar speed
>>> for compression and decompression.
>>
>> When
> On Jan 11, 2016, at 11:05 AM, Andre McCurdy wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jan 9, 2016 at 8:42 AM, Richard Purdie
> wrote:
>> xz compresses with a better compression ratio than gz with similar speed
>> for compression and decompression.
>
> When you measured compression speed to be similar, was that wit
On Sat, Jan 9, 2016 at 8:42 AM, Richard Purdie
wrote:
> xz compresses with a better compression ratio than gz with similar speed
> for compression and decompression.
When you measured compression speed to be similar, was that with
parallel compression? If so, with how many CPU cores?
A quick tes
xz compresses with a better compression ratio than gz with similar speed
for compression and decompression. It therefore makes sense to switch
to it for the sstate objects.
As an example, the gcc-cross populate_sysroot object goes from
79,509,871 to 53,031,752 bytes which is a significant improvem
