On Wed, 2013-11-13 at 07:39 -0600, Mark Hatle wrote:
> On 11/13/13, 5:14 AM, Phil Blundell wrote:
> > On Wed, 2013-11-13 at 09:12 +0100, Martin Jansa wrote:
> >> On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 07:23:22PM -0600, Mark Hatle wrote:
> >>> When the -symlinks package was removed and an RPROVIDES was added, noth
On 11/13/13, 5:14 AM, Phil Blundell wrote:
On Wed, 2013-11-13 at 09:12 +0100, Martin Jansa wrote:
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 07:23:22PM -0600, Mark Hatle wrote:
When the -symlinks package was removed and an RPROVIDES was added, nothing
was put in to cause the removal of the older package in an upg
On Wed, 2013-11-13 at 09:12 +0100, Martin Jansa wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 07:23:22PM -0600, Mark Hatle wrote:
> > When the -symlinks package was removed and an RPROVIDES was added, nothing
> > was put in to cause the removal of the older package in an upgrade.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mark Ha
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 07:23:22PM -0600, Mark Hatle wrote:
> When the -symlinks package was removed and an RPROVIDES was added, nothing
> was put in to cause the removal of the older package in an upgrade.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Hatle
> ---
> meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils.inc | 1 +
>
When the -symlinks package was removed and an RPROVIDES was added, nothing
was put in to cause the removal of the older package in an upgrade.
Signed-off-by: Mark Hatle
---
meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils.inc | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/binut
