On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 07:23:22PM -0600, Mark Hatle wrote:
> When the -symlinks package was removed and an RPROVIDES was added, nothing
> was put in to cause the removal of the older package in an upgrade.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Hatle <mark.ha...@windriver.com>
> ---
> meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils.inc | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils.inc
> b/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils.inc
> index 17c66bc..ea2383e 100644
> --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils.inc
> +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils.inc
> @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ FILES_${PN} = " \
> ${prefix}/${TARGET_SYS}/bin/*"
>
> RPROVIDES_${PN} += "${PN}-symlinks"
> +RREPLACES_${PN} += "${PN}-symlinks"
IIRC for opkg backend you need also RCONFLICTS for opkg to really remove
old ${PN}-symlinks.
>
> FILES_${PN}-dev = " \
> ${includedir} \
> --
> 1.8.1.2.545.g2f19ada
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
--
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: martin.ja...@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
