On 25 March 2014 12:27, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 3:21 PM, Ross Burton wrote:
>> The GTK+ engine schemas are not insignicant in size but also mostly useless.
>> Put them in a sub-package instead of PN so they only get installed when
>> explicitly required.
>>
>> Signed-off-
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 3:21 PM, Ross Burton wrote:
> The GTK+ engine schemas are not insignicant in size but also mostly useless.
> Put them in a sub-package instead of PN so they only get installed when
> explicitly required.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ross Burton
Isn't it breaking runtime update? Peo
The GTK+ engine schemas are not insignicant in size but also mostly useless.
Put them in a sub-package instead of PN so they only get installed when
explicitly required.
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton
---
meta/recipes-gnome/gtk-engines/gtk-engines_2.20.2.bb |3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+
