On 25 March 2014 12:27, Otavio Salvador <ota...@ossystems.com.br> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 3:21 PM, Ross Burton <ross.bur...@intel.com> wrote: >> The GTK+ engine schemas are not insignicant in size but also mostly useless. >> Put them in a sub-package instead of PN so they only get installed when >> explicitly required. >> >> Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.bur...@intel.com> > > Isn't it breaking runtime update? People with a running system which > updates it using package feeds are going to get it removed. Am I > missing something?
There is the possibility of a migration path but honestly, nothing is using those files and I'd be surprised if they were installed by anyone. I guess there should be a replaces/conflicts to ensure that PN-schemas doesn't clash with PN in upgrades. Ross -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
