Op 3 jun 2011, om 11:50 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven:
> On Fri, 2011-06-03 at 10:59 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
>> Op 3 jun 2011, om 10:24 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven:
>>
>>> On Fri, 2011-06-03 at 08:37 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
Op 3 jun 2011, om 03:06 heeft Khem
On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 18:06 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> mdev or udev are image features so probably should be controlled by
> IMAGE_FEATURES or some such
Well, yeah, but this is the thing with busybox: it is a monolithic
executable, so you need to decide at configure time what features it's
going to
On Fri, 2011-06-03 at 10:59 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
> Op 3 jun 2011, om 10:24 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven:
>
> > On Fri, 2011-06-03 at 08:37 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
> >> Op 3 jun 2011, om 03:06 heeft Khem Raj het volgende geschreven:
> >>
> >>> On Thursday, June 02, 2011 09:37:41
Op 3 jun 2011, om 10:24 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven:
> On Fri, 2011-06-03 at 08:37 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
>> Op 3 jun 2011, om 03:06 heeft Khem Raj het volgende geschreven:
>>
>>> On Thursday, June 02, 2011 09:37:41 AM Richard Purdie wrote:
On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 20:40 +000
On Fri, 2011-06-03 at 08:37 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
> Op 3 jun 2011, om 03:06 heeft Khem Raj het volgende geschreven:
>
> > On Thursday, June 02, 2011 09:37:41 AM Richard Purdie wrote:
> >> On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 20:40 +, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 20:37, Phil Blundell
Op 3 jun 2011, om 03:06 heeft Khem Raj het volgende geschreven:
> On Thursday, June 02, 2011 09:37:41 AM Richard Purdie wrote:
>> On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 20:40 +, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 20:37, Phil Blundell wrote:
On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 20:09 +, Otavio Salvad
On Thursday, June 02, 2011 09:37:41 AM Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 20:40 +, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 20:37, Phil Blundell wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 20:09 +, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> > >> -# CONFIG_MDEV is not set
> > >> +CONFIG_MDEV=y
> >
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 16:37, Richard Purdie
wrote:
> I'm afraid I'm with Phil on this. I don't like the idea of enabling
> something we don't actually use. This really needs to become some kind
> of configure option which would at the same time disable/replace udev so
> the patch in its currently
On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 20:40 +, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 20:37, Phil Blundell wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 20:09 +, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> >> -# CONFIG_MDEV is not set
> >> +CONFIG_MDEV=y
> >
> > Per previous discussion, I am still uneasy about this change. I t
On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 20:09 +, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> -# CONFIG_MDEV is not set
> +CONFIG_MDEV=y
Per previous discussion, I am still uneasy about this change. I think
we really need some sort of coherent policy for what exactly the default
busybox configuration in oe-core is meant to be doi
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 20:37, Phil Blundell wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 20:09 +, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> -# CONFIG_MDEV is not set
>> +CONFIG_MDEV=y
>
> Per previous discussion, I am still uneasy about this change. I think
> we really need some sort of coherent policy for what exactly th
Since we do not require a configuration file by default we don't force
it's addition on the package. If the a layer wants to have it enabled
it should also set the CONFFILES for busybox-mdev package.
Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador
---
meta/recipes-core/busybox/busybox-1.18.4/defconfig |2 +-
12 matches
Mail list logo
