Op 3 jun 2011, om 03:06 heeft Khem Raj het volgende geschreven: > On Thursday, June 02, 2011 09:37:41 AM Richard Purdie wrote: >> On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 20:40 +0000, Otavio Salvador wrote: >>> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 20:37, Phil Blundell <p...@pbcl.net> wrote: >>>> On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 20:09 +0000, Otavio Salvador wrote: >>>>> -# CONFIG_MDEV is not set >>>>> +CONFIG_MDEV=y >>>> >>>> Per previous discussion, I am still uneasy about this change. I think >>>> we really need some sort of coherent policy for what exactly the >>>> default busybox configuration in oe-core is meant to be doing, and >>>> then (if necessary) a set of patches to make it match the policy. >>>> Just flipping random features on and off does not seem like a good way >>>> to proceed. >>> >>> OE-core has support to mdev as device handling mechanism as such this >>> ought to be enabled by default IMO. >>> >>> Personally it doesn't matter since I have already overriden it in my >>> internal layer. >> >> I'm afraid I'm with Phil on this. I don't like the idea of enabling >> something we don't actually use. This really needs to become some kind >> of configure option which would at the same time disable/replace udev so >> the patch in its currently form isn't acceptable. >> > > mdev or udev are image features so probably should be controlled by > IMAGE_FEATURES or some such
You can't put IMAGE_FEATURES in the equivalent of EXTRA_OECONF since the packages in the feeds don't magically change when being installed in a different image. _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
