jurobystri...@hotmail.com; openembedded-
> c...@lists.openembedded.org
> Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] glibc: Allow 64 bit atomics for x86
>
> On Thu, 2015-10-29 at 15:29 -0700, Randy Witt wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 3:20 PM, Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2015-10-29 at 15:29 -0700, Randy Witt wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 3:20 PM, Richard Purdie
> wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-10-29 at 13:43 -0700, Juro Bystricky wrote:
> > This patch fixes [YOCTO#8140].
> >
> > The fix consist of allowing 64bit atomic ops f
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 3:20 PM, Richard Purdie <
richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-10-29 at 13:43 -0700, Juro Bystricky wrote:
> > This patch fixes [YOCTO#8140].
> >
> > The fix consist of allowing 64bit atomic ops for x86.
> > This should be safe for i586 and newer CPUs.
On Thu, 2015-10-29 at 13:43 -0700, Juro Bystricky wrote:
> This patch fixes [YOCTO#8140].
>
> The fix consist of allowing 64bit atomic ops for x86.
> This should be safe for i586 and newer CPUs.
> It also makes the synchronization more efficient.
>
> Signed-off-by: Juro Bystricky
> ---
> .../gl
: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] glibc: Allow 64 bit atomics for x86
>
> On 10/29/15 3:43 PM, Juro Bystricky wrote:
> > This patch fixes [YOCTO#8140].
> >
> > The fix consist of allowing 64bit atomic ops for x86.
> > This should be safe for i586 and newer CPUs.
> > It a
On 10/29/15 3:43 PM, Juro Bystricky wrote:
> This patch fixes [YOCTO#8140].
>
> The fix consist of allowing 64bit atomic ops for x86.
> This should be safe for i586 and newer CPUs.
> It also makes the synchronization more efficient.
I'm not sure this is correct.. see below.
> Signed-off-by: Juro
This patch fixes [YOCTO#8140].
The fix consist of allowing 64bit atomic ops for x86.
This should be safe for i586 and newer CPUs.
It also makes the synchronization more efficient.
Signed-off-by: Juro Bystricky
---
.../glibc/glibc/use_64bit_atomics.patch| 24 ++
m