On Wed, 2016-02-24 at 19:49 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-02-24 at 16:09 +, Lock, Joshua G wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 2016-02-24 at 16:37 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello!
> > >
> > > I haven't had a chance to play with the actual code yet and I
> > > don't
> > > know
> >
On Wed, 2016-02-24 at 15:40 -0500, Philip Balister wrote:
> On 02/24/2016 02:51 PM, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 24 Feb 2016 11:35:25 Philip Balister wrote:
> > >
> > > On 02/24/2016 11:06 AM, Trevor Woerner wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Ideally the work done here and the work done on meta-
> >
On 02/24/2016 02:51 PM, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Feb 2016 11:35:25 Philip Balister wrote:
>> On 02/24/2016 11:06 AM, Trevor Woerner wrote:
>>> Ideally the work done here and the work done on meta-swupdate[1] would
>>> be somehow merged so people creating images/distros would only have to
>
On Wed, 24 Feb 2016 11:35:25 Philip Balister wrote:
> On 02/24/2016 11:06 AM, Trevor Woerner wrote:
> > Ideally the work done here and the work done on meta-swupdate[1] would
> > be somehow merged so people creating images/distros would only have to
> > learn and integrate one software update solut
On Wed, 2016-02-24 at 16:09 +, Lock, Joshua G wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-02-24 at 16:37 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> > Hello!
> >
> > I haven't had a chance to play with the actual code yet and I don't
> > know
> > yet when I'll be able to. Let me ask for some clarifications about
> > the
> > appro
> Dnia 24 luty 2016 o 17:35 Philip Balister napisał(a):
>
>
> On 02/24/2016 11:06 AM, Trevor Woerner wrote:
> > Ideally the work done here and the work done on meta-swupdate[1] would
> > be somehow merged so people creating images/distros would only have to
> > learn and integrate one software upd
On 02/24/2016 11:06 AM, Trevor Woerner wrote:
> Ideally the work done here and the work done on meta-swupdate[1] would
> be somehow merged so people creating images/distros would only have to
> learn and integrate one software update solution, instead of having to
> evaluate and choose between the
On Wed, 2016-02-24 at 16:37 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I haven't had a chance to play with the actual code yet and I don't
> know
> yet when I'll be able to. Let me ask for some clarifications about
> the
> approach first anyway.
>
> On Wed, 2016-02-24 at 14:52 +, Joshua Lock wro
Ideally the work done here and the work done on meta-swupdate[1] would
be somehow merged so people creating images/distros would only have to
learn and integrate one software update solution, instead of having to
evaluate and choose between the two (or more?).
[1] https://github.com/sbabic/me
Hello!
I haven't had a chance to play with the actual code yet and I don't know
yet when I'll be able to. Let me ask for some clarifications about the
approach first anyway.
On Wed, 2016-02-24 at 14:52 +, Joshua Lock wrote:
> Approach:
> An image that inherits the swupd-image bbclass will aut
This series provides an initial set of changes to enable integration of the
swupd (https://clearlinux.org/features/software-update) software updater into an
image.
The changes are in the relatively early stages but I am hoping to land this work
before the M3 feature freeze so that the 2.1 release
11 matches
Mail list logo
