On Wed, 24 Feb 2016 11:35:25 Philip Balister wrote: > On 02/24/2016 11:06 AM, Trevor Woerner wrote: > > Ideally the work done here and the work done on meta-swupdate[1] would > > be somehow merged so people creating images/distros would only have to > > learn and integrate one software update solution, instead of having to > > evaluate and choose between the two (or more?). > > > > [1] https://github.com/sbabic/meta-swupdate > > Amen. I had the same thoughts reading the patch set intro.
I think it would be hard to integrate these two, since they operate quite differently to eachother. > Maybe the swupd should go in a seperate layer so we can see which > project works best for oe users before moving something directly into > oe-core? This makes sense to me too though FWIW. The os-release patch should probably go straight in, but everything else looks like it could comfortably live in a separate layer without making things too difficult. Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
