From: Bruce Ashfield
Hi all,
Here's the latest set of bugfix/CVEs that I've collected for the
linux-yocto reference kernels.
I did a quick build on the AB and everything came back green.
Cheers,
Bruce
The following changes since commit 9c20e8de6f262a4bda7879eb5c43ec5cb9ded016:
bitbake: bi
From: Bruce Ashfield
Hi all,
Sending out my queued patches for linux-yocto. These are mostly for ARC
support, but there are also -stable updates pushed for 4.4/4.9 if anyone
is using those kernels. SRCREV patches for maintained branches will follow
for those changes.
Cheers,
Bruce
The followi
From: Bruce Ashfield
Hi all,
In preparation for getting a 5.x kernel into the tree, I'm clearing out
my existing -stable bumps for the active kernels.
Nothing radical here, and they've built and booted on all the relevant
architectures.
Cheers,
Bruce
The following changes since commit 251ded
Hi all,
Here is the latest set of changes to linux-yocto. There are some other changes
pending, but I wanted to get this smaller set out now, so RP can run some tests
against the qemuarm refresh.
Cheers,
Bruce
The following changes since commit 676705765ad58db79c23fddd6a53f5907a5812bd:
ref-m
Hi all,
Here's the next batch of kernel updates. Nothing particular of note, but we
do gain new BSP descriptions for qemuarma15 and qemuriscv64. Although the
full machine definitions are not in oe-core yet, this sets the table for them
to be made widely available.
Other than that, I bumped the -d
Hi all,
Given how close we are to the release, I'm staying away from -stable updates
to the linux-yocto kernels. But I do have one small patch integration and two
minor bug fixes that are worth getting in for the release.
I don't expect any issues with these .. famous last words :D
Cheers,
Bruc
Hi all,
Here is the latest update of content for the 4.8 kernel, it contains:
- 4.8 -rc7
- yaffs2 fixes from Kevin Hao
- aufs is available
- configuration warning fixes
- preempt-rt
I've also included a fixup of the 4.1.32 and configuration warning fixes
for that tree.
Full disclosure: the
Hi all,
Just some routine updates to the 4.1 and 4.4 kernel trees. We have a -stable
update and some backports.
Cheers,
Bruce
The following changes since commit 6c5d7f1fb276cbe0a461ece6c8f0ca17a478fa8c:
lib/oe/package_manager: adapt for Python 3 (2016-06-05 23:39:47 +0100)
are available in
Hi all,
Here are some pending -stable updates to 4.1 and 4.4, along with a beaglebone
configuration tweak.
While I haven't done a gcc6 build myself, the 4.1 -stable updates contain
a backported compiler.h fix from 4.4+ that resolves some of the issues
with gcc6 (and in particular the poky-lsb one
Richard/Saul,
Small updates to import the latest -stable updates for the 3.10 and 3.4
kernels, as well as some fixes for preempt-rt on qemumarm and minor
configuration tweaks.
Built and booted locally.
Bruce
The following changes since commit 1e084f9d755e3458d2f9863382fa3bb7877a146d:
qemu:
Richard/Saul,
Here are three fixes for the upcoming RCs and release. Once is a new branch, but
has zero impact on existing boards, so I've gone ahead and added it for this
upcoming release. The other two are bug fixes.
[PATCH 1/3] linux-yocto/3.8: add haswell-wc board config and branch
Bumpin
Richard/Saul,
Just clearing my queue of some recent changes.
- version bumps for v3.4.19, v3.4.20
- a change to make the fetch aware of the fact that the meta
branch name can change
- emenlow BSP changes for a psb -> emgd switch
Sanity checks all pass on my local builds and boots.
Cheers,
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 10:22 AM, Saul Wold wrote:
> On 08/26/2012 09:49 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
>>
>> Richard/Saul,
>>
>> Here's some changes that I've staged over the past week or so,
>> everything checks out here, and there are some good changes in
>> this set of -stable updates, and and the
On 08/26/2012 09:49 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
Richard/Saul,
Here's some changes that I've staged over the past week or so,
everything checks out here, and there are some good changes in
this set of -stable updates, and and the linker fix from Khem.
I've also got a small tools fix here as well,
Richard/Saul,
Here's some changes that I've staged over the past week or so,
everything checks out here, and there are some good changes in
this set of -stable updates, and and the linker fix from Khem.
I've also got a small tools fix here as well, that was needed
for some of the yocto-bsp build
On 03/04/2012 08:01 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
Richard/Saul,
Here's the latest consolidated kernel pull request. The patches are as follows:
3/3 is the kernel updates:
- v3.0.23 stable update
- v3.2.9 stable update
- 3.0/3.2: fri2 updates (pch + configuration changes) from Darren Hart
Richard/Saul,
Here's the latest consolidated kernel pull request. The patches are as follows:
3/3 is the kernel updates:
- v3.0.23 stable update
- v3.2.9 stable update
- 3.0/3.2: fri2 updates (pch + configuration changes) from Darren Hart
- 3.0: pvr merge from Kishore Bodke
- linux-yoc
On 02/27/2012 11:34 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
Richard/Saul,
Here's a consolidated pull reqeset for the some kernel items.
- a bump of 3.0 to 3.0.22
- a bump of 3.2 to 3.2.7
- A fix for yocto 2032
You can cherry pick the bug fix by itself. As for the version
updates, I've built and boo
Richard/Saul,
Here's a consolidated pull reqeset for the some kernel items.
- a bump of 3.0 to 3.0.22
- a bump of 3.2 to 3.2.7
- A fix for yocto 2032
You can cherry pick the bug fix by itself. As for the version
updates, I've built and booted them on my development machine
and on a clean m
Richard/Saul,
Here's a 3pack of kernel changes. The breakdown is as follows:
1) kern-tools: import flexible branching support
This fixes an issue that Saul found with the Intel boards that
use the yocto/emgd, yocto/eg20t graphics branches. We need to
be able to have features that allow a branch
Richard/Saul,
Flushing my queue of pending updates. This refreshes the 3.0
base to v3.0.12 and updates our -rt branches to the corresponding
update.
This also pulls in the EFI changes from Darren.
This one should be random carrage return free, built and booted
locally. Smoke tests all pass.
Che
On Wed, 2011-09-14 at 14:11 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> Richard/Saul,
>
> Here's a series of changes I've had locally since last week. The
> two kernel only ones are simple enough.
>
> - a configuration split to clean our x86 BSPs
> - a build fix for rt
>
> The net result of the cleanup i
Richard/Saul,
Here's a series of changes I've had locally since last week. The
two kernel only ones are simple enough.
- a configuration split to clean our x86 BSPs
- a build fix for rt
The net result of the cleanup is zero, since the configs are the
same, so there's no reason not to do it.
On Fri, 2011-09-02 at 23:03 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> Richard/Saul,
>
> This took a bit longer than I wanted (this was intended for Thursday), but
> since this was potentially the last minor rev bump for yocto 1.1, I wanted
> to build and boot all of the qemu targets, and the -rt targets as
Richard/Saul,
This took a bit longer than I wanted (this was intended for Thursday), but
since this was potentially the last minor rev bump for yocto 1.1, I wanted
to build and boot all of the qemu targets, and the -rt targets as well.
While doing this, I noticed that there were still some lurk
On 08/15/2011 01:24 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
Richard/Saul,
We've had some good mileage on the 3.0.x kernel. I've been building
and booting these boards for weeks now and the meta-intel based BSPs
have all been switching over and all of Darren's -rt work was done
on top of 3.0.
So the big part
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 1:20 AM, Bruce Ashfield
wrote:
> Richard/Saul,
>
> Here's a consolidated set of changes that I've been testing with
> for the past few days. The patches are pretty much self explanitory.
>
> 1/3: linux-yocto: restoring LINUX_VERSION ?= "3.0"
>
> After discussions on the ma
Richard/Saul,
Here's a consolidated set of changes that I've been testing with
for the past few days. The patches are pretty much self explanitory.
1/3: linux-yocto: restoring LINUX_VERSION ?= "3.0"
After discussions on the mailing list, we are going to go back to the
1.0 model and not cycle th
Richard/Saul,
We've had some good mileage on the 3.0.x kernel. I've been building
and booting these boards for weeks now and the meta-intel based BSPs
have all been switching over and all of Darren's -rt work was done
on top of 3.0.
So the big part of this pull request is the removal of the expli
On 05/09/2011 11:34 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
Saul/Richard,
The first two patches are a split and resend of the machine
movement patch:
[
linux-yocto: move non-core machines to meta-yocto
The machine configuration of the non-core (non-qemu) machines
has moved to meta-yocto. Moving
Saul/Richard,
The first two patches are a split and resend of the machine
movement patch:
[
linux-yocto: move non-core machines to meta-yocto
The machine configuration of the non-core (non-qemu) machines
has moved to meta-yocto. Moving the branch mappings, compatibility
and SRCREVs o
Richard/Saul,
I've been running with these changes since before ELC, so they've had
some good soak time. The first two changes lay the ground for for some
1.1 functionality and are used by recipes in the meta-kernel-dev layer.
The changes are transparent to existing recipes.
In particular they ar
32 matches
Mail list logo
