On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 12:44 PM, Mark Hatle wrote:
> On 9/18/15 4:35 AM, Jack Mitchell wrote:
>> On 17/09/15 17:20, Alejandro Joya wrote:
>>> It provide a virtual reference for the common utilities.
>>> it replace of the lock to busybox, it will be simple exchange between other
>>> common utiliti
On 9/18/15 4:35 AM, Jack Mitchell wrote:
> On 17/09/15 17:20, Alejandro Joya wrote:
>> It provide a virtual reference for the common utilities.
>> it replace of the lock to busybox, it will be simple exchange between other
>> common utilities like gnu core utils or toybox among others.
>>
>> In ord
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 2:35 AM, Jack Mitchell wrote:
> is 'anybox' a good name for the virtual provider? What happens if we have a
> new suite of core utility replacements without box in the name, I assume it
> will be a nightmare to retroactivly change the name so we should probably
> come up wi
On 17/09/15 17:20, Alejandro Joya wrote:
It provide a virtual reference for the common utilities.
it replace of the lock to busybox, it will be simple exchange between other
common utilities like gnu core utils or toybox among others.
In order to enable its required to fill at the distro conf or
It provide a virtual reference for the common utilities.
it replace of the lock to busybox, it will be simple exchange between other
common utilities like gnu core utils or toybox among others.
In order to enable its required to fill at the distro conf or local.conf
VIRTUAL-RUNTIME_login_manager
