On Tue, 2014-06-10 at 10:42 -0600, Gary Thomas wrote:
> On 2014-06-10 10:37, Mark Hatle wrote:
> > On 6/10/14, 11:32 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> >> When building on XFS filesystems, the resulting rpms can be corrupted
> >> with the same inode number being used for multiple hardlinked files.
> >> Th
On 2014-06-10 10:37, Mark Hatle wrote:
On 6/10/14, 11:32 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
When building on XFS filesystems, the resulting rpms can be corrupted
with the same inode number being used for multiple hardlinked files.
There are two fixes, one to stop rpm crashing when accessing a broken
bina
On 6/10/14, 11:32 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
When building on XFS filesystems, the resulting rpms can be corrupted
with the same inode number being used for multiple hardlinked files.
There are two fixes, one to stop rpm crashing when accessing a broken
binary rpm, the other to stop generating the
When building on XFS filesystems, the resulting rpms can be corrupted
with the same inode number being used for multiple hardlinked files.
There are two fixes, one to stop rpm crashing when accessing a broken
binary rpm, the other to stop generating them in the first places. Full
descriptions in t
