Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] archiver.bbclass: Archive the native builds as well

2013-01-20 Thread Holger Hans Peter Freyther
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 12:56:08PM +, Richard Purdie wrote: Dear Richard, > So there could well be a problem here but I'm not feeling happy we've > solved it yet. More information would be appreciated. I agree. The removal of -native comes from the fact that I wanted the source opkg-utils-na

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] archiver.bbclass: Archive the native builds as well

2013-01-20 Thread Richard Purdie
On Sat, 2013-01-19 at 09:44 +0100, Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote: > On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 10:25:43AM -0800, Saul Wold wrote: > > > > I understand what the issue is here, but I am not sure this is the > > right solution. This will likely bring in way more than is wanted or > > needed for sourc

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] archiver.bbclass: Archive the native builds as well

2013-01-19 Thread Holger Hans Peter Freyther
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 10:25:43AM -0800, Saul Wold wrote: > > I understand what the issue is here, but I am not sure this is the > right solution. This will likely bring in way more than is wanted or > needed for source archiving. > > What's needed from the opkg-utils-native? IANAL so let me sa

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] archiver.bbclass: Archive the native builds as well

2013-01-18 Thread Saul Wold
On 01/18/2013 10:24 AM, kevin.stras...@linux.intel.com wrote: On my build no copy of gcc/opkg-utils was archived. For gcc it is bad as libgcc will end up in the image and the sources should be provided. Update the method and comment to not exclude the native version of the build. Native package

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] archiver.bbclass: Archive the native builds as well

2013-01-18 Thread kevin . strasser
> On my build no copy of gcc/opkg-utils was archived. For gcc it is > bad as libgcc will end up in the image and the sources should be > provided. Update the method and comment to not exclude the native > version of the build. Native packages shouldn't be included in the target image, and therefor

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] archiver.bbclass: Archive the native builds as well

2013-01-18 Thread Saul Wold
On 01/18/2013 06:34 AM, Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote: On my build no copy of gcc/opkg-utils was archived. For gcc it is bad as libgcc will end up in the image and the sources should be provided. Update the method and comment to not exclude the native version of the build. I understand what

[OE-core] [PATCH] archiver.bbclass: Archive the native builds as well

2013-01-18 Thread Holger Hans Peter Freyther
On my build no copy of gcc/opkg-utils was archived. For gcc it is bad as libgcc will end up in the image and the sources should be provided. Update the method and comment to not exclude the native version of the build. --- meta/classes/archiver.bbclass |4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+),