On 01/18/2013 06:34 AM, Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote:
On my build no copy of gcc/opkg-utils was archived. For gcc it is
bad as libgcc will end up in the image and the sources should be
provided. Update the method and comment to not exclude the native
version of the build.
I understand what the issue is here, but I am not sure this is the right
solution. This will likely bring in way more than is wanted or needed
for source archiving.
What's needed from the opkg-utils-native?
Sau!
---
meta/classes/archiver.bbclass | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/meta/classes/archiver.bbclass b/meta/classes/archiver.bbclass
index a4a2158..516f947 100644
--- a/meta/classes/archiver.bbclass
+++ b/meta/classes/archiver.bbclass
@@ -187,11 +187,11 @@ def get_applying_patches(d):
def not_tarball(d):
"""
- packages including key words 'work-shared', 'native', 'packagegroup-' will
be passed
+ packages including key words 'work-shared', 'packagegroup-' will be passed
"""
workdir = d.getVar('WORKDIR', True)
s = d.getVar('S', True)
- if 'work-shared' in s or 'packagegroup-' in workdir or 'native' in workdir:
+ if 'work-shared' in s or 'packagegroup-' in workdir:
return True
else:
return False
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
