Where can I find documentation on the shared state system?
--rich
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
Doh. Please nevermind. Looks like I'm getting caught up in my own url
confusion combined with ssh: fetcher trouble.
--rich
On 8/15/12 1:39 PM, Rich Pixley wrote:
If I build core-image-minimal with BB_GENERATE_MIRROR_TARBALLS :=
"1"... in my local.conf
And then I start
If I build core-image-minimal with BB_GENERATE_MIRROR_TARBALLS := "1"...
in my local.conf
And then I start a second build, with:
SOURCE_MIRROR_URL := "file://.../firstbuild/.../downloads"
INHERIT += "own-mirrors"
BB_FETCH_PREMIRRORONLY := "1"
BB_NO_NETWORK := "1"
It fails almost immediatel
On 7/3/12 10:01 , Saul Wold wrote:
On 07/03/2012 09:42 AM, Rich Pixley wrote:
Where can I find a description of the recent changes and what I need to
do to bring my files back up to current?
What were the incompatible changes?
For bblayers.conf, we bumped the version becase we moved the
Where can I find a description of the recent changes and what I need to
do to bring my files back up to current?
What were the incompatible changes?
--rich
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linux
diff --git a/meta/conf/documentation.conf b/meta/conf/documentation.conf
index 004a16c..1d57044 100644
--- a/meta/conf/documentation.conf
+++ b/meta/conf/documentation.conf
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ PV[doc] = "PV holds the version of the package
(Package Version). The default va
retrieved from the bitb
On 5/30/12 11:44 , Otavio Salvador wrote:
Dear Rich,
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 3:35 PM, Rich Pixley <mailto:rich.pix...@palm.com>> wrote:
Has anyone considered the possibility of introducing upstart to
oe-core, perhaps as an alternative?
How would people feel about patc
Has anyone considered the possibility of introducing upstart to oe-core,
perhaps as an alternative?
How would people feel about patches to do that?
I ask because "classic", (read, "former" and "proprietary"), WebOS used
upstart and we're considering whether to attempt to continue to do so as
On 5/9/12 16:26 , Richard Purdie wrote:
The settings that are now recommended are:
BB_SIGNATURE_HANDLER ?= 'OEBasicHash'
OELAYOUT_ABI = "8"
This requires a rebuild since the stamp file format changes, hence the
ABI number increase. Currently, poky and angstrom use these settings
amongst others
On 5/9/12 16:32 , Richard Purdie wrote:
On Wed, 2012-05-09 at 16:20 -0700, Rich Pixley wrote:
My rebuild completed in 5 seconds.
Thank you very much!
I'd rather not fork bitbake locally. Can I expect this patch to show up
in git://git.openembedded.org/bitbake sometime soon?
Yes, I
My rebuild completed in 5 seconds.
Thank you very much!
I'd rather not fork bitbake locally. Can I expect this patch to show up
in git://git.openembedded.org/bitbake sometime soon?
--rich
On 5/9/12 13:32 , Richard Purdie wrote:
Hi Rich,
You might like to try the change below as I think it
On 5/9/12 12:52 , Richard Purdie wrote:
On Wed, 2012-05-09 at 10:51 -0700, Rich Pixley wrote:
On 5/8/12 05:34 , Richard Purdie wrote:
On Sun, 2012-05-06 at 10:36 -0700, Rich Pixley wrote:
Any other ideas?
Well, this clearly doesn't happen with master or in any combination of
the layers
On 5/8/12 05:34 , Richard Purdie wrote:
On Sun, 2012-05-06 at 10:36 -0700, Rich Pixley wrote:
On 5/2/12 16:06 , Richard Purdie wrote:
On Wed, 2012-05-02 at 14:48 -0500, Mark Hatle wrote:
On 5/2/12 2:45 PM, Rich Pixley wrote:
What would really help is a way to reproduce this...
Does it
On 5/6/12 10:36 , Rich Pixley wrote:
On 5/2/12 16:06 , Richard Purdie wrote:
On Wed, 2012-05-02 at 14:48 -0500, Mark Hatle wrote:
On 5/2/12 2:45 PM, Rich Pixley wrote:
On 5/2/12 12:40 , Mark Hatle wrote:
On 5/2/12 2:16 PM, Rich Pixley wrote:
On 5/2/12 11:40 , Mark Hatle wrote:
On 5/2/12 1
On 5/2/12 16:06 , Richard Purdie wrote:
On Wed, 2012-05-02 at 14:48 -0500, Mark Hatle wrote:
On 5/2/12 2:45 PM, Rich Pixley wrote:
On 5/2/12 12:40 , Mark Hatle wrote:
On 5/2/12 2:16 PM, Rich Pixley wrote:
On 5/2/12 11:40 , Mark Hatle wrote:
On 5/2/12 1:21 PM, Rich Pixley wrote:
I'm s
On 5/2/12 12:40 , Mark Hatle wrote:
On 5/2/12 2:16 PM, Rich Pixley wrote:
On 5/2/12 11:40 , Mark Hatle wrote:
On 5/2/12 1:21 PM, Rich Pixley wrote:
I'm seeing a lot of builds apparently hanging forever, (the ones that
work seem to work within seconds - the ones that hang seem to hang f
On 5/2/12 11:40 , Mark Hatle wrote:
On 5/2/12 1:21 PM, Rich Pixley wrote:
I'm seeing a lot of builds apparently hanging forever, (the ones that
work seem to work within seconds - the ones that hang seem to hang for
at least 10's of minutes), with:
rich@dolphin> nice tail -
I'm seeing a lot of builds apparently hanging forever, (the ones that
work seem to work within seconds - the ones that hang seem to hang for
at least 10's of minutes), with:
rich@dolphin> nice tail -f Log
MACHINE = "qemux86"
DISTRO= ""
DISTRO_VERSION= "oe-core.0"
TUNE_
How do I determine which mirror was/is being used to download a
particular component?
I'm expecting some info in a log, or from the output of "bitbake -D",
but I'm not finding it. And from a glance at the code I don't see any
message statements around the mirror iterations although I could ea
On 2/24/12 04:55 , Richard Purdie wrote:
Someone recently asked me about using external source trees with
OE-Core. [...]
Opinions on including this class?
I see value.
Our workflow, (based on an ancient branch of oe), uses something
similar. When working on a component in context, (as distinc
On 2/23/12 12:11 , Richard Purdie wrote:
On Thu, 2012-02-23 at 11:21 -0800, Rich Pixley wrote:
On 2/23/12 02:16 , Richard Purdie wrote:
On Wed, 2012-02-22 at 16:47 -0800, Rich Pixley wrote:
What happens if two separate bitbake invocations both simultaneously
attempt to download the same file
On 2/23/12 02:16 , Richard Purdie wrote:
On Wed, 2012-02-22 at 16:47 -0800, Rich Pixley wrote:
What happens if two separate bitbake invocations both simultaneously
attempt to download the same file?
The first will download it, the second will wait for it to finish, then
both will continue with
Excellent, thanks. That's the news I was hoping for.
--rich
On 2/22/12 15:41 , Saul Wold wrote:
On 02/22/2012 03:33 PM, Rich Pixley wrote:
Is it reasonable to expect to share DL_DIR between multiple builds?
Absolutely, We share DL_DIR via NFS across multiple machines and builds.
Th
fetch it again
Tom
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 1:33 PM, Rich Pixley <mailto:rich.pix...@palm.com>> wrote:
Is it reasonable to expect to share DL_DIR between multiple builds?
That is, are downloads properly locked so that multiple concurrent
downloads of the same file won't collide?
Is it reasonable to expect to share DL_DIR between multiple builds?
That is, are downloads properly locked so that multiple concurrent
downloads of the same file won't collide? And if so, are they NFS safe
locks?
Or must each build download it's own copies of every component?
I ask because
the links to bitbake mailing lists from this wiki page:
http://www.openembedded.org/wiki/BitBake_%28dev%29
appear to be obsolete. If there's a more current location for these
lists, I haven't found it yet.
--rich
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
26 matches
Mail list logo
