It is worth to give a try to add PSEUDO_UNLOAD=1 sync before tar. The issue
doesn't appear on my CentOS 5.9 after doing that.
Best Regards,
Zhenhua
> -Original Message-
> From: openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org
> [mailto:openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org
Randy,
Thanks for the update.
Best Regards,
Zhenhua
> -Original Message-
> From: Randy MacLeod [mailto:randy.macl...@windriver.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 1:25 AM
> To: Luo Zhenhua-B19537
> Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Yu Zongchun-B40527
Hi Randy,
Any update? Can this patch be applied?
Now "sed -e 's/if status != 0/if status == 0/' sanity.bbclass" is needed in my
test script to ensure Yocto can work on our build server.
Best Regards,
Zhenhua
> -Original Message-----
> From: Luo Zhenhua-B19537
Sorry for sending to the wrong mailing list.
Please ignore.
Best Regards,
Zhenhua
> -Original Message-
> From: Luo Zhenhua-B19537
> Sent: Monday, July 01, 2013 1:51 PM
> To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> Cc: Liu Ting-B28495; Guo Chunrong-B40290; Yu Zongc
9537@busy ~]$
[b19537@busy ~]$ gcc -march=x86-64 -o gcc_test_new gcc_test_new.c
[b19537@busy ~]$ echo $?
0
[b19537@busy ~]$
Best Regards,
Zhenhua
> -Original Message-
> From: Randy MacLeod [mailto:randy.macl...@windriver.com]
> Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2013 6:17 AM
> To: Lu
Ping.
> -Original Message-
> From: Luo Zhenhua-B19537
> Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2013 9:26 PM
> To: 'Richard Purdie'; Randy MacLeod
> Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Yu Zongchun-B40527
> Subject: RE: [OE-core] [oe-core][patch v2] sanity.bbclass:
= switch
Please confirm if this is same as your result.
Best Regards,
Zhenhua
> -Original Message-
> From: Richard Purdie [mailto:richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2013 9:04 PM
> To: Luo Zhenhua-B19537; Randy MacLeod
> Cc: op
When the u-boot(HEAD of master in git://git.freescale.com/ppc/sdk/u-boot.git)
of p1022ds is built with different binutils in Yocto, the result is different.
With binutils-2.23.1(last version in Yocto), u-boot can be built correctly.
With binutils-2.23.2(current version in Yocto), the build fail
Please ignore this patch.
Another patch has been sent out to fix the same issue.
http://patches.openembedded.org/patch/50617/
Best Regards,
Zhenhua
> -Original Message-
> From: Luo Zhenhua-B19537
> Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2013 5:06 PM
> To: openembedded-core@lists.open
Hi Mark,
Thanks for your comments.
> -Original Message-
> From: openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org
> [mailto:openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of Mark
> Hatle
> Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2013 10:47 PM
>
> On 5/23/13 3:46 A
Hi all,
I am trying the multilib feature of Yocto, and I want to make sure if below
scenarios are supported, who can help to clarify? Thanks in advance.
For standalone toolchain built by "bitbake meta-toolchain"
1. Can the same gcc binary build both 32b and 64b applications or two different
g
Recently I met a /usr/lib/perl5 conflict error, following is the details, is
there any idea to solve such kind of issue?
When perl is built, the output includes /usr/lib/perl folder and /usr/lib/perl5
symbol link, libhugetlbfs also produces /usr/lib/perl5 folder, there might be
conflict when do
Thanks for the comments and patch, the patch works well during our build test.
Best Regards,
Zhenhua
> -Original Message-
> From: Richard Purdie [mailto:richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org]
> Sent: Friday, April 12, 2013 4:42 AM
> To: Khem Raj
> Cc: Luo Zhenhua-B1953
I tried to build wayland-native which requires sys/signalfd.h and
sys/timerfd.h, the two headers are not provided by Yocto build env, so host
version is searched.
When the build is conducted in Linux distros with old glibc(not sure about the
accurate version), above two headers are not availab
> -Original Message-
> From: Richard Purdie [mailto:richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org]
> Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2013 9:39 PM
>
> On Wed, 2013-03-27 at 10:55 +0000, Luo Zhenhua-B19537 wrote:
> > When I build nativesdk toolchain, following build error appears
> s
When I build nativesdk toolchain, following build error appears sometimes, any
suggestion to solve the issue?
"tar: ./sysroots/ppce500mc-fsl_networking-linux/var/lib/rpm/__db.002: file
changed as we read it"
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Zhenhua
e [mailto:richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2013 11:45 PM
> To: Luo Zhenhua-B19537
> Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> Subject: Re: [OE-core] Build issue of nativesdk toolchain
>
> On Tue, 2013-03-26 at 14:29 +, Luo Zhenhua-B19537 wrote:
When I build nativesdk toolchain with recent poky + meta-fsl-ppc + FSL SDK
specific layers, build issue similar to error-1 happens. This issue might
appear for different gcc related package during different trial, e.g. libgcc,
gcc, gcc-cross-initial, gcc-crosssdk, etc.
When I revert
http://gi
\
> >>"
> >
> > Don't we need to depend on this package somewhere so that it gets
> > installed?
>
> I think it should be required from the rootfs_rpm.bbclass in some way.
[Luo Zhenhua-B19537] Is following the right way to include the rpm-post
> Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2013 5:32 PM
> To: Luo Zhenhua-B19537
> Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Guo Chunrong-B40290
> Subject: Re: [OE-core] [oe-core] rpm: fix probably redundant RPATH issue
>
> On Thu, 2013-03-21 at 15:00 +0800, Zhenhua Luo wrote:
> > Clear the r
t want RPM actually installed?
>
> That seems reasonable to me. I hadn't realized that it was rolled into
> the target RPM package like this. In early implementations this script
> was installed directly by the rootfs_rpm.
[Luo Zhenhua-B19537] Yes, in my use case, I only
V3 is sent out to include a new patch for this build issue, please ignore this
one.
Best Regards,
Zhenhua
> -Original Message-
> From: Luo Zhenhua-B19537
> Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2013 11:59 AM
> To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> Cc: Liu Ting-B28495; Guo
Please ignore the patch, v2 has been sent out to fix a semi-colon missing
issue.
Best Regards,
Zhenhua
> -Original Message-
> From: Luo Zhenhua-B19537
> Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2013 11:34 AM
> To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> Cc: Liu Ting-B28495; Luo
Can anybody shed some light, please?
Best Regards,
Zhenhua
> -Original Message-
> From: Luo Zhenhua-B19537
> Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2012 11:53 AM
> To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; 'yo...@yoctoproject.org'
> Subject: Difference of toolchain
Thanks for the comment, I will submit a patch to fix it.
Best Regards,
Zhenhua
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Jansa [mailto:martin.ja...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2012 5:26 PM
> To: Luo Zhenhua-B19537
> Cc: openembedded-comm...@lists.openembedded.or
It is a bit confused for the different recipes of toolchian, can somebody help
to explain what's the difference for those recipes? E.g. gcc-cross,
gcc-cross-canadian, gcc-cross-initial, gcc-cross-intermediate, gcc-crosssdk,
gcc-crosssdk-initial, gcc-crosssdk-intermediate, gcc-runtime, etc.
Is
Wrong operation, please ignore.
Best Regards,
Zhenhua
> -Original Message-
> From: yocto-boun...@linux.freescale.net [mailto:yocto-
> boun...@linux.freescale.net] On Behalf Of Luo Zhenhua-B19537
> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 3:32 PM
> To: yo...@linu
a/recipes-devtools/valgrind/valgrind-3.7.0/valgrind-3.7.0-fix-err
> > or-of-reading-debug-info.patch
>
> Patch needs Upstream-Status:
[Luo Zhenhua-B19537] should the status be Pending if the patch has not been
sent to upstream?
> > +SRC_URI_append_powerpc = &quo
10:42 PM
> To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer; Luo Zhenhua-B19537
> Subject: Re: [OE-core] [oe-core] linux-dtb: add multi-dtb build support
>
> Zhenhua,
>
> Any update here?
>
> -M
>
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 5:50 PM, Matthew McClintock
> wrote:
&
I meet a different behavior of IMAGE_FSTYPES in edison branch and denzil branch.
In edison branch:
IMAGE_FSTYPES is defined as following in poky/meta/conf/bitbake.conf.
IMAGE_FSTYPES ?= "tar.gz"
I defined IMAGE_FSTYPES as following in my customized image bb file(in my layer)
IMAGE_FSTYPES ?= "tar.
Richard,
Thanks for your comments, I will submit new version to use RRECOMMENDS.
Best Regards,
Zhenhua
> -Original Message-
> From: openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org
> [mailto:openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of
> Richard Purdie
> Sent: Wedne
43 PM
> To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
> Cc: Luo Zhenhua-B19537
> Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH oe-core v6] linux-dtb: add multi-dtb build
> support
> and keep dtb in deploy cache package
>
> On 01/08/2012 07:37 PM, b19...@freescale.com wrote:
> > Fr
gt; I am not sure how this worked, I am seeing a problem with building rootfs.
> |
>
> kernel-devicetree is needed by
> kernel-modules-
> 3.0.14+git1+6ae3d992cf546184010e87a0349810198f1d167c_1+58ffdb8000e34d2ba7c3ef278
> b26680b0886e8b5-r2.mpc8315e_rdb
>
> This might be a
Please ignore.
Best Regards,
Zhenhua
> -Original Message-
> From: Luo Zhenhua-B19537
> Sent: Monday, January 09, 2012 4:58 PM
> To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> Cc: Luo Zhenhua-B19537
> Subject: [PATCH] FSLONLY: adjust the meta-oe layer sequence to ma
"=" is needless, I will fix the error. Seems it doesn't impact the result. :)
Best Regards,
Zhenhua
> -Original Message-
> From: Saul Wold [mailto:s...@linux.intel.com]
> Sent: Friday, January 06, 2012 3:06 PM
> To: Patches and discussions about the oe-c
A new version is submitted according to the comments.
Best Regards,
Zhenhua
> -Original Message-
> From: Luo Zhenhua-B19537
> Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2012 11:34 AM
> To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> Cc: Luo Zhenhua-B19537
> Subject: [PATCH oe-c
A new version is submitted.
Best Regards,
Zhenhua
> -Original Message-
> From: Luo Zhenhua-B19537
> Sent: Tuesday, December 27, 2011 11:34 AM
> To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> Cc: Luo Zhenhua-B19537
> Subject: [PATCH v3 oe-core] linux-dtb: add multi
to
> do_install instead and this confuses the purposes of the different tasks.
>
> If the files were placed into ${DEPLOYDIR} as part of do_deploy, things would
> be
> much more consistent.
[Luo Zhenhua-B19537] I think you point is to merge do_install_append and
do_depl
Since valgrind has been upgraded to 3.7.0, a new patch to add powerpc support
will be submitted, please ignore this one.
Best Regards,
Zhenhua
> -Original Message-
> From: Luo Zhenhua-B19537
> Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2011 10:39 AM
> To: openembedded-core@lists.open
882; Garg Vakul-B16394; Luo Zhenhua-B19537
> Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH oe-core] valgrind: add powerpc to the compatible
> host and add eglibc-dbg in rdepends
>
> On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 6:15 AM, Martin Jansa wrote:
> >> > If a dependency on the libc debug packag
gt; > On Wednesday 28 December 2011 14:55:08 b19...@freescale.com wrote:
> > > +RDEPENDS += "eglibc-dbg"
> >
> > So I might be completely off-base here having never tried it, but what
> > if you're using uclibc?
>
> I don't really understand
ded.org
> Cc: Luo Zhenhua-B19537
> Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH oe-core] valgrind: add powerpc to the compatible
> host and add eglibc-dbg in rdepends
>
> On Wednesday 28 December 2011 14:55:08 b19...@freescale.com wrote:
> > +RDEPENDS += "eglibc-dbg"
>
> So I m
Please ignore.
A new version will be submitted.
Best Regards,
Zhenhua
> -Original Message-
> From: Luo Zhenhua-B19537
> Sent: Friday, December 23, 2011 11:00 AM
> To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> Cc: Luo Zhenhua-B19537
> Subject: [PATCH v2 oe-core]
December 22, 2011 7:09 PM
> To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
> Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH oe-core] valgrind: add powerpc into the
> compatible
> host list
>
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 9:07 PM, Richard Purdie
> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-12-21 a
E_BASE_NAME}.dtb
> ${DEPLOYDIR}/${KERNEL_IMAGE_BASE_NAME}.dtb
> > +cd ${DEPLOYDIR}
> > +ln -sf ${KERNEL_IMAGE_BASE_NAME}.dtb
> > +${KERNEL_IMAGE_SYMLINK_NAME}.dtb }
> What machines did you test this on? Is it possible that some kernels do not
> generate .dtb files?
[Luo Zhenhu
werpc into the
> compatible
> host list
>
> On Mon, 2011-12-19 at 10:32 +, Luo Zhenhua-B19537 wrote:
> > Sure, if valgrind can work on x86, powerpc, arm, COMPATIBLE_HOST can be
> removed, I will post a v2 patch.
>
> Can someone confirm
Sure, if valgrind can work on x86, powerpc, arm, COMPATIBLE_HOST can be
removed, I will post a v2 patch.
Best Regards,
Zhenhua
> -Original Message-
> From: openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org [mailto:openembedded-
> core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of Koen
e: [OE-core] after modifying source code in work/, how to rebuild
> package?
>
> Sorry, this workflow will clean all your changes. How about that:
>
> bitbake projectname -c compile -f
> bitbake projectname
[Luo Zhenhua-B19537] Those commands sh
48 matches
Mail list logo
