[OE-core] [CONSOLIDATED PULL 00/51]

2013-11-19 Thread Saul Wold
Richard, This is the pending pulls since last week that we have held up due to various issue with the autobuilder. As I send the email, the AB had not completed yet, but I have reviewed these patches and build them locally for 3 platforms. Please review the final AB output. There are at least

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/7] packagegroup-core-boot: Drop build-time dependency on virtual/kernel

2013-11-19 Thread ChenQi
On 11/17/2013 09:52 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: * because kernel isn't needed to build packagegroup and building it doesn't influence if it's included in image or not. Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa --- meta/recipes-core/packagegroups/packagegroup-core-boot.bb | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] kernel: restore scripts in the sysroot

2013-11-19 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 9:59 PM, Khem Raj wrote: > > On Nov 19, 2013, at 2:45 PM, Richard Purdie > wrote: > >> On Tue, 2013-11-19 at 14:39 -0800, Khem Raj wrote: >>> On Nov 19, 2013, at 2:36 PM, Richard Purdie >>> wrote: >>> On Tue, 2013-11-19 at 14:29 -0800, Khem Raj wrote: > We

Re: [OE-core] kernel build fail after update

2013-11-19 Thread ChenQi
I met the same error when I inherited 'rm_work' in local.conf and performed a world build. This is reproducible with the latest code. 1. add in local.conf INHERIT += "rm_work" 2. bitbake world //Chen Qi On 11/19/2013 07:21 AM, Yi Qingliang wrote: after update poky, I got error when comp

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] kernel: restore scripts in the sysroot

2013-11-19 Thread Khem Raj
On Nov 19, 2013, at 2:45 PM, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Tue, 2013-11-19 at 14:39 -0800, Khem Raj wrote: >> On Nov 19, 2013, at 2:36 PM, Richard Purdie >> wrote: >> >>> On Tue, 2013-11-19 at 14:29 -0800, Khem Raj wrote: >>> Well reproducer case is that build from sstate but such that an

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] grub-efi: change to generate EFI image in target package

2013-11-19 Thread jackie.huang
From: Jackie Huang It's not a good idea to generate the target EFI image in a native packge, it would be a problem when build a 64bit target on 32bit host. In fact, all we need from grub-efi-native is the grub-mkimage binary, so change the solution to: * grub-efi-native only install grub-mkimage

[OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] grub-efi: allow compilation without large model support

2013-11-19 Thread jackie.huang
From: Jackie Huang -mcmodel=large is not supported by gcc with version lower than 4.4, but we don't need to use memory over 4GiB, so add a patch to allow compilation without large model support. Signed-off-by: Jackie Huang --- ...allow-a-compilation-without-mcmodel-large.patch | 69 +++

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/2 v3] grub-efi: change to generate EFI image in target package

2013-11-19 Thread jackie.huang
From: Jackie Huang v3 comments: Drop the original solution to generate and deploy EFI image in the -native packae and change to do that in taret package, and the -native one only provides the grub-mkimage binary. No need 3 files anymore, make them in one bb. -- The following changes since commit

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] sanity.bbclass: Don't fatal() when trying to dump environment.

2013-11-19 Thread Peter Seebach
On Wed, 20 Nov 2013 01:35:32 +0100 Martin Jansa wrote: > Inconsistent whitespace argh. I totally thought I'd fixed those all. Fixed that one too, updated the branch on contrib. -s -- Listen, get this. Nobody with a good compiler needs to be justified.

Re: [OE-core] kernel build fail after update

2013-11-19 Thread Yi Qingliang
On Tuesday, November 19, 2013 11:35:14 AM Phil Blundell wrote: > On Tue, 2013-11-19 at 09:24 +, Phil Blundell wrote: > > On Tue, 2013-11-19 at 07:21 +0800, Yi Qingliang wrote: > > >I found one patch 'Use hardlinks for do_populate_sysroot for speed' > > >may be related with this error. > > > >

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] sanity.bbclass: Don't fatal() when trying to dump environment.

2013-11-19 Thread Martin Jansa
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 06:31:57PM -0600, Peter Seebach wrote: > It is distressing when bitbake -e can't run due to sanity check > failures, because the solution often involves figuring out what > configuration file are being read and what values they are setting. > Solution: Don't do that. If the

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/1] Make sanity check failures nonfatal for bitbake -e

2013-11-19 Thread Peter Seebach
This patch depends on a separate patch to bitbake providing an isTracking() in DataSmart. The goal here is that if you run "bitbake -e", you can get variable values and include history even if something is horribly wrong, because "something is horribly wrong" is precisely when "bitbake -e" is most

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] sanity.bbclass: Don't fatal() when trying to dump environment.

2013-11-19 Thread Peter Seebach
It is distressing when bitbake -e can't run due to sanity check failures, because the solution often involves figuring out what configuration file are being read and what values they are setting. Solution: Don't do that. If the datasmart object reports that tracking is enabled, emit an error() but

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] kernel: restore scripts in the sysroot

2013-11-19 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 6:44 PM, Phil Blundell wrote: > On Tue, 2013-11-19 at 17:37 -0500, Bruce Ashfield wrote: >> Alternatively, recipes need to be fixed to call the >> modules-base.bbclass routine to restore >> scripts, and I think it is obvious that won't work in all cases. > > Admittedly I'm

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] kernel: restore scripts in the sysroot

2013-11-19 Thread Richard Purdie
On Tue, 2013-11-19 at 14:39 -0800, Khem Raj wrote: > On Nov 19, 2013, at 2:36 PM, Richard Purdie > wrote: > > > On Tue, 2013-11-19 at 14:29 -0800, Khem Raj wrote: > > > >> Well reproducer case is that build from sstate but such that an external > >> module needs to be rebuilt > >> if external

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] kernel: restore scripts in the sysroot

2013-11-19 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 5:42 PM, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Tue, 2013-11-19 at 17:37 -0500, Bruce Ashfield wrote: >> >> Exactly. And I had windriver bug with the same symptoms as yours. It >> was a package >> that built its own modules, and hence never called this either. >> >> > and my recipes di

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] kernel: restore scripts in the sysroot

2013-11-19 Thread Phil Blundell
On Tue, 2013-11-19 at 17:37 -0500, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > Alternatively, recipes need to be fixed to call the > modules-base.bbclass routine to restore > scripts, and I think it is obvious that won't work in all cases. Admittedly I'm no expert, but this is not obvious to me. Why can't those reci

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] kernel: restore scripts in the sysroot

2013-11-19 Thread Richard Purdie
On Tue, 2013-11-19 at 17:37 -0500, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > > Exactly. And I had windriver bug with the same symptoms as yours. It > was a package > that built its own modules, and hence never called this either. > > > and my recipes did override module_do_compile task but not do_compile like > >

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] kernel: restore scripts in the sysroot

2013-11-19 Thread Phil Blundell
On Tue, 2013-11-19 at 14:29 -0800, Khem Raj wrote: > Well reproducer case is that build from sstate but such that an external > module needs to be rebuilt > if external module also comes from sstate then it all is fine. Its only when > everything is coming from > sstate except this external modul

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] kernel: restore scripts in the sysroot

2013-11-19 Thread Khem Raj
On Nov 19, 2013, at 2:36 PM, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Tue, 2013-11-19 at 14:29 -0800, Khem Raj wrote: > >> Well reproducer case is that build from sstate but such that an external >> module needs to be rebuilt >> if external module also comes from sstate then it all is fine. Its only when

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] kernel: restore scripts in the sysroot

2013-11-19 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 5:29 PM, Khem Raj wrote: > > On Nov 19, 2013, at 10:17 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > >> Adding Khem. >> >> Khem .. see below. >> >> On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 12:54 PM, Bruce Ashfield >> wrote: >>> On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Phil Blundell wrote: On Tue, 2013-11-19

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] kernel: restore scripts in the sysroot

2013-11-19 Thread Richard Purdie
On Tue, 2013-11-19 at 14:29 -0800, Khem Raj wrote: > Well reproducer case is that build from sstate but such that an external > module needs to be rebuilt > if external module also comes from sstate then it all is fine. Its only when > everything is coming from > sstate except this external modu

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] kernel: restore scripts in the sysroot

2013-11-19 Thread Khem Raj
On Nov 19, 2013, at 10:17 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > Adding Khem. > > Khem .. see below. > > On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 12:54 PM, Bruce Ashfield > wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Phil Blundell wrote: >>> On Tue, 2013-11-19 at 17:37 +, Mike Crowe wrote: On Tuesday 08 Octobe

Re: [OE-core] State of bitbake world

2013-11-19 Thread Martin Jansa
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 06:36:41PM +, Paul Eggleton wrote: > On Tuesday 19 November 2013 19:20:12 Martin Jansa wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 04:59:19PM +0100, Andreas Müller wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Martin Jansa > wrote: > > > > On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 12:08:25AM +01

Re: [OE-core] State of bitbake world

2013-11-19 Thread Paul Eggleton
On Tuesday 19 November 2013 19:20:12 Martin Jansa wrote: > On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 04:59:19PM +0100, Andreas Müller wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 12:08:25AM +0100, Martin Jansa wrote: > > >> Starting now I'll use > > >> http://openem

Re: [OE-core] [oe] State of bitbake world

2013-11-19 Thread Martin Jansa
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 04:30:09PM +, Paul Eggleton wrote: > Hi Martin, > > On Tuesday 19 November 2013 16:50:40 Martin Jansa wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 12:08:25AM +0100, Martin Jansa wrote: > > > Starting now I'll use > > > http://openembedded.org/wiki/Bitbake_World_Status > > > to po

Re: [OE-core] [oe] State of bitbake world

2013-11-19 Thread Martin Jansa
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 05:01:06PM +0100, Andrea Adami wrote: > On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 4:56 PM, Joe MacDonald wrote: > > [Re: [OE-core] State of bitbake world] On 13.11.19 (Tue 16:50) Martin Jansa > > wrote: > > > >> On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 12:08:25AM +0100, Martin Jansa wrote: > >> > Starting n

Re: [OE-core] State of bitbake world

2013-11-19 Thread Martin Jansa
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 04:59:19PM +0100, Andreas Müller wrote: > On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 12:08:25AM +0100, Martin Jansa wrote: > >> Starting now I'll use > >> http://openembedded.org/wiki/Bitbake_World_Status > >> to post results from my bi

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] kernel: restore scripts in the sysroot

2013-11-19 Thread Bruce Ashfield
Adding Khem. Khem .. see below. On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 12:54 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Phil Blundell wrote: >> On Tue, 2013-11-19 at 17:37 +, Mike Crowe wrote: >>> On Tuesday 08 October 2013 at 17:12:54 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote: >>> > When building ag

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] kernel.bbclass: Call make with correct variables in kernelscripts_sstate_postinst

2013-11-19 Thread Phil Blundell
On Tue, 2013-11-19 at 17:49 +, Mike Crowe wrote: > On Tuesday 19 November 2013 at 12:41:40 -0500, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > > What issue was this causing for you ? The scripts are native, and hence > > should just be using the build machines compiler, linker and don't need > > the kernel args. >

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] kernel.bbclass: Call make with correct variables in kernelscripts_sstate_postinst

2013-11-19 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Tue, 2013-11-19 at 12:41 -0500, Bruce Ashfield wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 12:37 PM, Mike Crowe wrote: >> > Ensure that the environment variable and command line arguments that are >> > used when calling make in kernel_do_compile

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] kernel: restore scripts in the sysroot

2013-11-19 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Phil Blundell wrote: > On Tue, 2013-11-19 at 17:37 +, Mike Crowe wrote: >> On Tuesday 08 October 2013 at 17:12:54 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote: >> > When building against the sysroot, out of tree modules can require modpost >> > and other utilities normally fou

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] kernel.bbclass: Call make with correct variables in kernelscripts_sstate_postinst

2013-11-19 Thread Mike Crowe
On Tuesday 19 November 2013 at 12:41:40 -0500, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 12:37 PM, Mike Crowe wrote: > > Ensure that the environment variable and command line arguments that are > > used when calling make in kernel_do_compile are used in > > kernelscripts_sstate_postinst. >

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] kernel: restore scripts in the sysroot

2013-11-19 Thread Phil Blundell
On Tue, 2013-11-19 at 17:37 +, Mike Crowe wrote: > On Tuesday 08 October 2013 at 17:12:54 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > > When building against the sysroot, out of tree modules can require modpost > > and other utilities normally found in the kernel's scripts directory. For > > the kernel sour

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] kernel.bbclass: Ensure compiler is available for do_populate_sysroot_setscene

2013-11-19 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 12:37 PM, Mike Crowe wrote: > kernelscripts_sstate_postinst uses the compiler (and therefore binutils) to > generate the kernel scripts so it must declare a dependency on them. The > ones in DEPENDS don't apply to do_populate_sysroot_setscene. > > Signed-off-by: Mike Crowe

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] kernel.bbclass: Call make with correct variables in kernelscripts_sstate_postinst

2013-11-19 Thread Richard Purdie
On Tue, 2013-11-19 at 12:41 -0500, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 12:37 PM, Mike Crowe wrote: > > Ensure that the environment variable and command line arguments that are > > used when calling make in kernel_do_compile are used in > > kernelscripts_sstate_postinst. > > What issue

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] kernel.bbclass: Call make with correct variables in kernelscripts_sstate_postinst

2013-11-19 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 12:37 PM, Mike Crowe wrote: > Ensure that the environment variable and command line arguments that are > used when calling make in kernel_do_compile are used in > kernelscripts_sstate_postinst. What issue was this causing for you ? The scripts are native, and hence should

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] kernel.bbclass: Ensure compiler is available for do_populate_sysroot_setscene

2013-11-19 Thread Mike Crowe
kernelscripts_sstate_postinst uses the compiler (and therefore binutils) to generate the kernel scripts so it must declare a dependency on them. The ones in DEPENDS don't apply to do_populate_sysroot_setscene. Signed-off-by: Mike Crowe --- meta/classes/kernel.bbclass |2 ++ 1 file changed, 2

[OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] kernel.bbclass: Call make with correct variables in kernelscripts_sstate_postinst

2013-11-19 Thread Mike Crowe
Ensure that the environment variable and command line arguments that are used when calling make in kernel_do_compile are used in kernelscripts_sstate_postinst. Signed-off-by: Mike Crowe --- meta/classes/kernel.bbclass |3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/meta/

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] kernel: restore scripts in the sysroot

2013-11-19 Thread Mike Crowe
On Tuesday 08 October 2013 at 17:12:54 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > When building against the sysroot, out of tree modules can require modpost > and other utilities normally found in the kernel's scripts directory. For > the kernel source in the staging dir, these scripts have been removed to > a

Re: [OE-core] [oe] State of bitbake world

2013-11-19 Thread Paul Eggleton
Hi Martin, On Tuesday 19 November 2013 16:50:40 Martin Jansa wrote: > On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 12:08:25AM +0100, Martin Jansa wrote: > > Starting now I'll use > > http://openembedded.org/wiki/Bitbake_World_Status > > to post results from my bitbake world buils. > > It was updated few times since t

Re: [OE-core] [oe] State of bitbake world

2013-11-19 Thread Andrea Adami
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 4:56 PM, Joe MacDonald wrote: > [Re: [OE-core] State of bitbake world] On 13.11.19 (Tue 16:50) Martin Jansa > wrote: > >> On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 12:08:25AM +0100, Martin Jansa wrote: >> > Starting now I'll use >> > http://openembedded.org/wiki/Bitbake_World_Status >> > to

Re: [OE-core] State of bitbake world

2013-11-19 Thread Andreas Müller
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: > On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 12:08:25AM +0100, Martin Jansa wrote: >> Starting now I'll use >> http://openembedded.org/wiki/Bitbake_World_Status >> to post results from my bitbake world buils. > > It was updated few times since this e-mail and I've

Re: [OE-core] State of bitbake world

2013-11-19 Thread Joe MacDonald
[Re: [OE-core] State of bitbake world] On 13.11.19 (Tue 16:50) Martin Jansa wrote: > On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 12:08:25AM +0100, Martin Jansa wrote: > > Starting now I'll use > > http://openembedded.org/wiki/Bitbake_World_Status > > to post results from my bitbake world buils. > > It was updated f

Re: [OE-core] State of bitbake world

2013-11-19 Thread Martin Jansa
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 12:08:25AM +0100, Martin Jansa wrote: > Starting now I'll use > http://openembedded.org/wiki/Bitbake_World_Status > to post results from my bitbake world buils. It was updated few times since this e-mail and I've received no feedback. Should I continue to post them or nobo

[OE-core] [RFC PATCH 1/4] scripts/oe-selftest: script to run builds as unitests against bitbake or various scripts

2013-11-19 Thread Stefan Stanacar
The purpose of oe-selftest is to run unittest modules added in scripts/lib/selftest/tests, which are tests against bitbake tools. The scripts/lib/selftest/tests path for tests is only temporary. Tests probably will be moved to meta/lib/oeqa/ once we've worked out how that can work. (the reason to

[OE-core] [RFC PATCH 4/4] scripts/lib/selftest: add more simple build tests

2013-11-19 Thread Stefan Stanacar
From: Alexandru Palalau Tests for RM_OLD_IMAGE and for WARN_QA/ERROR_QA behaviour. Signed-off-by: Alexandru Palalau Signed-off-by: Stefan Stanacar --- scripts/lib/selftest/tests/__init__.py | 1 + scripts/lib/selftest/tests/bboptions.py | 39 + 2 files change

[OE-core] [RFC PATCH 0/4] Script and layer for running tests

2013-11-19 Thread Stefan Stanacar
Hello, This series adds an oe-selftest script, some modules and a new layer meta-selftest. which are meant to help in writing tests (using python unittest) for various bitbake tools/scripts as well as simple output checks or do complete builds with different options (with the emphasis that ever

[OE-core] [RFC PATCH 2/4] meta-selftest: create a new test layer to be used by oe-selftest script

2013-11-19 Thread Stefan Stanacar
From: Corneliu Stoicescu Everything in this layer is meant to be used by tests. Signed-off-by: Corneliu Stoicescu Signed-off-by: Stefan Stanacar --- .gitignore | 1 + meta-selftest/COPYING.MIT | 17 + meta-selftest/

[OE-core] [RFC PATCH 3/4] scripts/lib/selftest: add a new module for bitbake output tests

2013-11-19 Thread Stefan Stanacar
From: Corneliu Stoicescu Tests for bitbake-layers and expected output for some bitbake options. Signed-off-by: Corneliu Stoicescu Signed-off-by: Stefan Stanacar --- scripts/lib/selftest/tests/__init__.py | 1 + scripts/lib/selftest/tests/bboutput.py | 86 ++ 2

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 00/14] Improvements to pybootchartgui

2013-11-19 Thread Peter Kjellerstedt
> -Original Message- > From: Burton, Ross [mailto:ross.bur...@intel.com] > Sent: den 16 november 2013 00:25 > To: Peter Kjellerstedt > Cc: OE-core > Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 00/14] Improvements to pybootchartgui > > Hi, > > On 15 November 2013 17:08, Peter Kjellerstedt > wrote: > >

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH V2] dbus: Don't depend on dbus-ptest-ptest for the nativesdk-dbus package

2013-11-19 Thread Dominik Holland
Hi, can anyone comment on my patch or push it into the master branch ? Dominik On 11/14/2013 05:15 PM, Dominik Holland wrote: I also changed RDEPENDS_class-native to RDEPENDS_dbus_class-native now --- meta/recipes-core/dbus/dbus.inc | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Re: [OE-core] kernel build fail after update

2013-11-19 Thread Phil Blundell
On Tue, 2013-11-19 at 09:24 +, Phil Blundell wrote: > On Tue, 2013-11-19 at 07:21 +0800, Yi Qingliang wrote: > >I found one patch 'Use hardlinks for do_populate_sysroot for speed' > >may be related with this error. > > The failure only seems to occur with the kernel, whereas I think that > pa

[OE-core] [PATCH] grub: add explicit dependency on bison-native

2013-11-19 Thread jackie.huang
From: Jackie Huang grub requires bison and it will fail to configure on the host without bison installed, add the dependency to fix it. Signed-off-by: Jackie Huang --- meta/recipes-bsp/grub/grub_2.00.bb | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/meta/recipes-bsp/grub/g

[OE-core] [V3 2/2] bluez4: use legacy pygobject instead of gobject-introspection

2013-11-19 Thread hongbo zhong
From: Zhong Hongbo pygobject-3.0 use GObject from gi.repository instead of gobject modules. Since oe-core use pygobject-2.x, change all of "from gi.repository import GObject" to "import gobject" for bluez4. Signed-off-by: Zhong Hongbo --- ...pygobject-instead-ofgobject-introspection.patch |

[OE-core] [V3 1/2] bluez4: Install the test script

2013-11-19 Thread hongbo zhong
From: Zhong Hongbo Signed-off-by: Zhong Hongbo --- .../bluez/bluez4-4.101/install-test-script.patch | 26 meta/recipes-connectivity/bluez/bluez4_4.101.bb|6 - 2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100644 meta/recipes-connectivity/blu

Re: [OE-core] RPROVIDES not package specific with native and added package

2013-11-19 Thread Mats Kärrman
Hi Phil, On Monday, November 18, 2013 7:28 PM, Phil Blundell wrote: > On Mon, 2013-11-18 at 13:28 +, Mats Kärrman wrote: > > On Monday, November 18, 2013 2:15 PM, Phil Blundell wrote: > > >> Subject: Re: [OE-core] RPROVIDES not package specific with native and > > >> added package > > >> > >

[OE-core] [PATCH] boot-directdisk: add the support of vmdk

2013-11-19 Thread yanjun.zhu
add the support of vmdk. --- meta/classes/boot-directdisk.bbclass | 21 ++--- 1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta/classes/boot-directdisk.bbclass b/meta/classes/boot-directdisk.bbclass index 5535728..3277666 100644 --- a/meta/classes/boot-directd

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] pr-util: insert appropriate parameter to adapt libtool

2013-11-19 Thread yzhu1
On 11/18/2013 08:20 PM, Richard Purdie wrote: On Mon, 2013-11-18 at 18:31 +0800, yanjun.zhu wrote: When ccache is enabled, a parameter "ccache" is inserted. libtool can not handle this parameter correctly. So "--tag=CC" is introduced to help libtool handle it. --- meta/recipes-support/apr/apr-

Re: [OE-core] kernel build fail after update

2013-11-19 Thread Phil Blundell
On Tue, 2013-11-19 at 07:21 +0800, Yi Qingliang wrote: > The stack trace of python calls that resulted in this exception/failure was: > File: 'sysroot_stage_all', lineno: 6, function: > 0002:def sysroot_stage_all(d): > 0003:oe.path.copyhardlinktree(d.expand("/mnt/src/kl360- > build/t

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] LSB_Test.sh: update rpm platform file when enable multilib

2013-11-19 Thread Kai Kang
When enable multilib for x86_64, lsb rpm packages both for archs x86_64 and i486 will be installed. But i486 target packages could not be installed that no such pattern in rpm platform file. Update platform file to enable install i486 rpm packages. Signed-off-by: Kai Kang --- meta/recipes-extend

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/1] LSB_Test.sh: update rpm platform file

2013-11-19 Thread Kai Kang
LSB_Test.sh: update rpm platform file to enable install i486 packages on x86-64 bsps when multlib is enabled. The following changes since commit e15893adf9268b2920b24c52d5c2bb777c6f778e: bitbake: serv.py: Give pr-server up to 5 seconds to commit data (2013-11-18 17:19:11 +) are available