...and a related question:
With SoftHSM 1.x and OpenDNSSEC 1.x, we were given a recipe to
perform backup of the SoftHSM database periodically. As I
understood it, OpenDNSSEC could be configured to "require backup"
before using a KSK, and we have our 1.x configured with
. My upgrade notes to Open
Hi,
Unless I missed something, I do not think I got any comprehensive answer
for this question.
Am I overthinking it and should I just go with the "file" backend?
On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 04:23:53PM +0200, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am currently running tests with SoftHSM2 to make sure th
On 10/9/19 4:23 PM, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am currently running tests with SoftHSM2 to make sure the migration
> from 1 to 2 goes without any hitch.
>
> The documentation of SoftHSM is pretty sparse, and I am wondering about
> objectstore.backend.
>
> The default is "file", which uses
Hi,
I am currently running tests with SoftHSM2 to make sure the migration
from 1 to 2 goes without any hitch.
The documentation of SoftHSM is pretty sparse, and I am wondering about
objectstore.backend.
The default is "file", which uses the filesystem as a database, and
another possibility is "d
