Hi, Unless I missed something, I do not think I got any comprehensive answer for this question.
Am I overthinking it and should I just go with the "file" backend? On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 04:23:53PM +0200, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > Hi, > > I am currently running tests with SoftHSM2 to make sure the migration > from 1 to 2 goes without any hitch. > > The documentation of SoftHSM is pretty sparse, and I am wondering about > objectstore.backend. > > The default is "file", which uses the filesystem as a database, and > another possibility is "db" which uses a SQLite3 database instead of the > filesystem, like SoftHSM1 used to do. > > I am wondering what are the pro and cons of each, knowing that my > OpenDNSSEC installation has thousands of domains. -- Mathieu Arnold
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Opendnssec-user mailing list Opendnssec-user@lists.opendnssec.org https://lists.opendnssec.org/mailman/listinfo/opendnssec-user
