T10243: Some KDE applications could use better icons

ndavis added a comment. In T10243#201333 , @ngraham wrote: > In T10243#201329 , @alex-l wrote: > > > EDIT: I have already said this here and there but please don't run any automated script to SVG ico

[okular] [Bug 342003] Trim margins confuses ordering of zoom steps while zooming out

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=342003 Nate Graham changed: What|Removed |Added CC||n...@kde.org -- You are receiving this mail beca

[okular] [Bug 342003] Trim margins confuses ordering of zoom steps while zooming out

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=342003 Zakhar changed: What|Removed |Added CC|zakhar.nasi...@gmail.com| -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the

[okular] [Bug 412002] Zoom out doesn't go beyond "Fit Width"

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=412002 Albert Astals Cid changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|WAITINGFORINFO |DUPLICATE Status|NEEDSINFO

[okular] [Bug 342003] Trim margins confuses ordering of zoom steps while zooming out

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=342003 Albert Astals Cid changed: What|Removed |Added CC||st...@kelem.net --- Comment #13 from Albert

[okular] [Bug 412002] Zoom out doesn't go beyond "Fit Width"

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=412002 --- Comment #3 from Steve Kelem --- As a matter of fact, I did! Never noticed this before, having searched only the Settings menu for settings. So, it's not a bug, but it would be nice to make this setting more visible. I wouldn't have guessed that Tri

[okular] [Bug 163493] Move 'Full screen mode' menu item from Settings menu into View menu

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=163493 Nate Graham changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|'Full screen mode' is |Move 'Full screen mode' |better

[okular] [Bug 163493] 'Full screen mode' is better in View menu than Settings menu (usability)

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=163493 Bug 163493 depends on bug 106807, which changed state. Bug 106807 Summary: 'Full Screen' option should really be in the 'View' menu https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106807 What|Removed |Added --

[okular] [Bug 163493] 'Full screen mode' is better in View menu than Settings menu (usability)

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=163493 Nate Graham changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REPORTED|CONFIRMED Ever confirmed|0

D15580: [WIP] New annotation toolbar

ngraham added a comment. If you don't like the proposed vertical toolbar, that's okay, but then we're going to need to sort out a lot of tricky UI issues for the horizontal toolbar and have perfect icons. REPOSITORY R223 Okular REVISION DETAIL https://phabricator.kde.org/D15580 To: sim

T10243: Some KDE applications could use better icons

ngraham added a comment. In T10243#201370 , @alex-l wrote: > I don't think glasses will ever look good at small sizes, can't we use something else for Okular? A clip? A highlighter? Looks okay to me at 32px: F7379054: Screenshot_20190918_

Re: T10243: Some KDE applications could use better icons

I'd agree that flatness taken too far becomes unattractive/dull also for me personally. When comparing Breeze and latest Iphone icons though, I think our set looks awesomeness, it is so good that i have yet to find something else that i would stick to and not go back to Breeze after relative short

Re: D15580: [WIP] New annotation toolbar

Sorry for the long silence. I have been busy at work and then on vacation. Personally I do not like the idea of the vertical toolbar specifically for Okular for the following reasons: - Okular differently from Gwenview already has a tab bar, which means that further splitting the reviews tab into

[okular] [Bug 412002] Zoom out doesn't go beyond "Fit Width"

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=412002 Albert Astals Cid changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REPORTED|NEEDSINFO CC|

T10243: Some KDE applications could use better icons

alex-l added a comment. I don't think glasses will ever look good at small sizes, can't we use something else for Okular? A clip? A highlighter? TASK DETAIL https://phabricator.kde.org/T10243 To: alex-l Cc: IohannesPetros, alex-l, starbuck, cullmann, IlyaBizyaev, ognarb, arrowd, abetts, s

T10243: Some KDE applications could use better icons

cullmann added a comment. Hmm, that looks more like a mail application ;=) As Tyson is already working on something, but at the moment has not much time, I would tend to just keep Kate's icon as is and look at the final stuff Tyson provides first. Otherwise I think that is a bit unfair.

T10243: Some KDE applications could use better icons

ngraham added a comment. That's not a bad icon, but again, I think we owe it to the app developers to be as true to the original icon as possible. That text-origami-bird icon is cool, but it has nothing to do with Kate's original icon. The HIG specifically recommends against this: > htt

T10243: Some KDE applications could use better icons

alex-l added a comment. Would something like this being enough for Kate i.e. an origami bird made of current icon paper? F7378729: immagine.png TASK DETAIL https://phabricator.kde.org/T10243 To: alex-l Cc: IohannesPetros, alex-l, starbuck, cullma

T10243: Some KDE applications could use better icons

cullmann added a comment. In T10243#201347 , @filipf wrote: > In T10243#201303 , @ngraham wrote: > > > Yeah, an app's icon is a part of its branding. It //should// look distinctive, not generic. Ide

T10243: Some KDE applications could use better icons

cullmann added a comment. In T10243#201341 , @alex-l wrote: > Here there is an example of brand artwork using that diagonal shape for Konsole: > > F7377581: immagine.png > > Edit: to be honest I thin

T10243: Some KDE applications could use better icons

filipf added a comment. In T10243#201303 , @ngraham wrote: > Yeah, an app's icon is a part of its branding. It //should// look distinctive, not generic. Ideally it communicates both its purpose ("I'm a text editor!") as well as its identity ("I'

T10243: Some KDE applications could use better icons

alex-l added a comment. Here there is an example of brand artwork using that diagonal shape for Konsole: F7377581: immagine.png TASK DETAIL https://phabricator.kde.org/T10243 To: alex-l Cc: IohannesPetros, alex-l, starbuck, cullmann, IlyaBizyaev,

T10243: Some KDE applications could use better icons

alex-l added a comment. What do you think about this kind of icon? This one is for Discover: the puzzle pieces indicate apps and other addons, the triangles the packages that ship the apps and the ">" shape looks like Plasma logo. F7377482: immagine.png

T10243: Some KDE applications could use better icons

alex-l added a comment. In T10243#201336 , @starbuck wrote: > Maybe look forward for this then for Plasma 6? Good idea, for me. TASK DETAIL https://phabricator.kde.org/T10243 To: alex-l Cc: IohannesPetros, alex-l, starbuck, cullmann, I

[okular] [Bug 412002] Zoom out doesn't go beyond "Fit Width"

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=412002 --- Comment #1 from Nate Graham --- Huh, works for me in git master. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

T10243: Some KDE applications could use better icons

starbuck added a subscriber: IohannesPetros. starbuck added a comment. I'd agree that flatness taken too far becomes unattractive/dull also for me personally. When comparing Breeze and latest Iphone icons though, I think our set looks awesomeness, it is so good that i have yet to find somet

T10243: Some KDE applications could use better icons

kossebau added a comment. In T10243#201331 , @ngraham wrote: > cold, barren, and excessively harsh and masculine. But you also don't go overboard on ornamentation or else it feels smothering, claustrophobic, and excessively feminine. I o

[okular] [Bug 412002] Zoom out doesn't go beyond "Fit Width"

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=412002 Nate Graham changed: What|Removed |Added CC||n...@kde.org -- You are receiving this mail beca

T10243: Some KDE applications could use better icons

ngraham added a comment. In T10243#201332 , @alex-l wrote: > @ngraham I don't know about macOS, but ElementaryOS icons look so good because they are designed for each size and I don't think we have the manpower to do that to Breeze icons.

T10243: Some KDE applications could use better icons

ngraham added a comment. In T10243#201329 , @alex-l wrote: > EDIT: I have already said this here and there but please don't run any automated script to SVG icons, because when opening them back in Inkscape they are corrupted and everytime I edit

T10243: Some KDE applications could use better icons

alex-l added a comment. @ngraham I don't know about macOS, but ElementaryOS icons look so good because they are designed for each size and I don't think we have the manpower to do that to Breeze icons. The diagonal thing in Konsole icon is to add some identity, without it we would have

T10243: Some KDE applications could use better icons

ngraham added a comment. I have a problem with //extreme// minimalism in same the way that I have a problem with extreme ornamentation. I don't like either one, when taken too far. The problem with doing this is that it irritates people who really dislike that style, and they push you to go

T10243: Some KDE applications could use better icons

alex-l added a comment. @ngraham I think you have a problem with minimalism :) original Breeze icon for Gwenview, Kate and KWrite were even worse than the current ones by me, in fact I already tried to go back to some Oxygen style. For reference, original Gwenview icon was the second on

D15580: [WIP] New annotation toolbar

simgunz added a comment. Sorry for the long silence. I have been busy at work and then on vacation. Personally I do not like the idea of the vertical toolbar specifically for Okular for the following reasons: - Okular differently from Gwenview already has a tab bar, which means that

T10243: Some KDE applications could use better icons

ngraham added a comment. The problem I have with Gwenview's icon is that it just feels inferior to the Oxygen one. The Oxygen icon has presence and communicates a style and brand, but doesn't really do a good job indicating what the app does. The Breeze icon feels like it tries to fix t

T10243: Some KDE applications could use better icons

mmustac updated the task description. TASK DETAIL https://phabricator.kde.org/T10243 To: mmustac Cc: alex-l, starbuck, cullmann, IlyaBizyaev, ognarb, arrowd, abetts, stikonas, knauss, mglb, filipf, mludwig, aacid, lesliezhai, elvisangelaccio, kossebau, trickyricky26, ndavis, yurchor, #kde_gam

T10243: Some KDE applications could use better icons

alex-l added a comment. Just to be clear, is Gwenview icon enough descriptive and distinctive at the same time? TASK DETAIL https://phabricator.kde.org/T10243 To: alex-l Cc: alex-l, starbuck, cullmann, IlyaBizyaev, ognarb, arrowd, abetts, stikonas, knauss, mglb, filipf, mludwig, aacid, le

T10243: Some KDE applications could use better icons

ngraham added a comment. Yeah, an app's icon is a part of its branding. It //should// look distinctive, not generic. Ideally it communicates both its purpose ("I'm a text editor!") as well as its identity ("I'm Kate!"). I think the problem with some of these icons is that they on;y do the fo

T10243: Some KDE applications could use better icons

alex-l added a comment. In T10243#201291 , @cullmann wrote: > Actually, that is exactly what I want to have: an arbitrary logo that is distinguishable. > It does Kate a big disservice that we have no icon like Atom/Sublime/Vim/... > A gen

T10243: Some KDE applications could use better icons

kossebau added a comment. Sounds like there should be some additional "Generic icon" entry in the app/desktopfile metadata, so people can decide whether they want to see brand-based icons or function-based icons, like there is with "Name" & "Generic Name". TASK DETAIL https://phabricator.

T10243: Some KDE applications could use better icons

cullmann added a comment. Actually, that is exactly what I want to have: an arbitrary logo that is distinguishable. It does Kate a big disservice that we have no icon like Atom/Sublime/Vim/... A generic "text" icon is nice for a mime-type. Users will easily detect where to start Atom, b

T10243: Some KDE applications could use better icons

alex-l added a comment. Hey there, Gwenview, Kate and Kwrite icons are by me. I'm here just to point out that those are icons i.e. UI elements. They must be simple and descriptive of what the app does. Instead if it's a matter of identity what you need is a logo and other artworks.

T10243: Some KDE applications could use better icons

starbuck added a comment. Personally I find the Breeze icons dope, especially Kontact, Yakuake, K3b and Ark. TASK DETAIL https://phabricator.kde.org/T10243 To: starbuck Cc: starbuck, cullmann, IlyaBizyaev, ognarb, arrowd, abetts, stikonas, knauss, mglb, filipf, mludwig, aacid, lesliezhai,

[okular] [Bug 396137] Okular hangs when scrolling fast on both pdf and djvu documents

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=396137 --- Comment #8 from Oliver Sander --- The problem just happened to me again, and from my extra debugging output I can now confirm that Albert's conjecture in Comment 6 is correct. No idea as to *why* that happens, though. -- You are receiving this ma