---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103129/#review11249
---
This review has been submitted with commit
4d8ba36488f84175b71
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=184489
--- Comment #14 from cxcxc...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #13)
> I'm on okular 0.14.1 on kde 4.8.1 on archlinux and I do NOT see this
> happening. This bug appears to be fixed. I did my taxes in February and
> okular worked perfectly fine even bac
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=184489
--- Comment #13 from Karthik Periagaram ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> No this is not fixed, even in Okular 0.14.0 on KDE 4.8.0. When "show forms",
> I can check a checkbox. However, after "hide forms", the tick goes away...
>
> The PDF file causing t
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=184489
cxcxc...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cxcxc...@gmail.com
--- Comment #12 from cxc
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=184196
Albert Astals Cid changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tsdg...@terra.es
Version Fixed In|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=295567
Bug ID: 295567
Severity: wishlist
Version: unspecified
Priority: NOR
Assignee: okular-devel@kde.org
Summary: Add ability to view embedded PDF files
Classification: Unclassified
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=184196
Albert Astals Cid changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=190203
Albert Astals Cid changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tsdg...@terra.es
--- Comment #2 from Albert
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111254
Albert Astals Cid changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xav...@alternatif.org
--- Comment #3 from A
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161811
Albert Astals Cid changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
El Dijous, 8 de març de 2012, a les 18:06:07, Costash va escriure:
> Hi,
Hi
>
> I have finally made this to work as it should.
>
> Brief description of what I did:
>
> I created a menu entry in contextMenuForFileItem to be able to edit the
> top-level bookmarks (fileItems).
> I made a function
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103129/
---
(Updated March 8, 2012, 10:10 p.m.)
Review request for Okular.
Changes
-
> On March 8, 2012, 7:39 p.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > I do really think this is a bad idea, at 1920x1080 an image uses around 8M
> > of memory, now go and open a 1000 page document and you need 8G of memory
> > just for the images of pages... And your computer decides to either crash
> >
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103129/#review11243
---
I do really think this is a bad idea, at 1920x1080 an image use
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104159/#review11242
---
What's the rationale of the setActive bit? Can we just shown/hi
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=295504
Christoph Feck changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|critical|crash
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=295504
Albert Astals Cid changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tsdg...@terra.es
--- Comment #1 from Albert
Hi,
I have finally made this to work as it should.
Brief description of what I did:
I created a menu entry in contextMenuForFileItem to be able to edit the
top-level bookmarks (fileItems).
I made a function in BookmarkManager class to be able to rename a bookmark
referenced by its KUrl, and used
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103129/
---
(Updated March 8, 2012, 10:23 a.m.)
Review request for Okular.
Changes
-
> On March 5, 2012, 10:34 p.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > I don't think i like this much.
> > * Who is painting that 'first frame' image? What if there is none?
> > * It seems to me that show(); setActive(false); setActive(true); will
> > result in stuff still not being shown, doesn't look
20 matches
Mail list logo
