Fully agree to Denis. Recommend to do the changes before publication
Von: Denis
Gesendet: Montag, 7. April 2025 21:20
An: Steffen Schwalm ; Kristina Yasuda
; ANTHONY NADALIN
Cc: torsten=40lodderstedt@dmarc.ietf.org; oauth
Betreff: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Re: Second WGLC for Token Status List
Caut
Would folks think it beneficial to add a very brief note in the document
saying something like "yeah yeah, we know it's not a traditional claim per
se but registering it seemed like a good idea nonetheless"?
On Thu, Apr 3, 2025 at 7:07 PM Nat Sakimura wrote:
> Catching up on the discussion now.
On Thu, Apr 3, 2025 at 11:33 AM Steffen Schwalm
wrote:
> I strongly oppose against moving forward the specification as Issues still
> open.
>
>
>
>1. There´s no documented decision on the well-known x509 issue –
>beside the wishes of the authors
>
>
Having seen and participated in discuss
I took a closer look to the document. Below are 17 comments. 1.The
current definition of a Status List is: Status List:An object in JSON or
CBOR representation containing a compressed byte array that represents
the statuses of many Referenced Tokens. This definition is ambiguous. It
is proposed
